|
[Sponsors] |
Different solutions among different computers |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 2, 2012, 14:14 |
Different solutions among different computers
|
#1 |
New Member
Juanito
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
Hello Foamers
I am running a supersonic case with OF (sonicFoam) and i would like to share this annoying experience in order to read your advices. I have 3 different computers with 3 different version of OF. One has Ubuntu with OF2.0.0; Other has Ubuntu with OF2.0.1 and the other one has Suse with OF2.1.0. When I run exactly the same case in them, they reach the same solution for UBUNTU computers, but completely different with SUSE one; they have almost the same numbers at the very begining of the simulation, but so different a few iterations later that UBUNTU seems to get a solution and in SUSE the courant number rises so much that diverges. I have attached the logs of the simulation of both of them if you want to take a look. Shouldn't get all of them the same (although not exactly) solution? Any comment? Remember that i run exactly the same case: same BCs, same schemes, same initial conditions, etc. Thanks in advance. |
|
October 4, 2012, 13:00 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Juanito
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 16 |
Thank you for your answer.
As you told me I have tested ubuntu with OF-2.1 and it reaches the same solution that suse OF-2.1. (thing that i should have tested before post the thread) Thank you for the observation. But, it makes me think about this: if OpenFOAM release notes for the new version say nothing about changes in this solver, can anybody tell me why different versions reach different solutions for the same case? Because it is not very usual that the old version finds a solution while the new one diverges. Regards |
|
October 4, 2012, 13:16 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 |
If it's exactly the same case, and the non-diverging solution makes sense, I would post a report along with the case on the official bug tracker.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. |
|
October 5, 2012, 08:05 |
|
#5 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,982
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings to all!
Before reporting, I would advise to check with OpenFOAM 2.1.1 and 2.1.x as well. Additionally, it would be helpful to have access to a simple example case that would replicate the problem, specially when you do the bug report! Last but not least: although solvers themselves don't change, the boundary conditions and other internal algorithms keep evolving and the cases usually need to be adjusted to the new ways of defining the boundary conditions, fvSchemes, fvSolutions and so on. Therefore, it's advisable to compare the reference tutorials between versions, for those you've based your cases on. As a good example of code evolution, check this bug report: http://www.openfoam.org/mantisbt/view.php?id=627 edit: I forgot to mention that numerical sensitivity can also change between versions! Best regards, Bruno
__________________
Last edited by wyldckat; October 5, 2012 at 08:06. Reason: see "edit:" |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure drop calculation and comparison to analytic solutions | n0name | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | August 16, 2012 04:36 |
multiple solutions using Fluent | Hanjie Lee | FLUENT | 3 | August 15, 2006 18:21 |
Analytical flow solutions | Antonio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 14, 2005 16:43 |
Analytical flow solutions | Antonio | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 15, 2005 18:47 |
Exact solutions | zhor | Main CFD Forum | 4 | May 13, 2001 12:26 |