|
[Sponsors] |
May 25, 2012, 22:54 |
pimpleDyMFoam or icoDyMFoam
|
#1 |
Member
Joe
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Groton, CT
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 15 |
If I'm looking to simulate a flow over a pitching airfoil at a Reynolds number of 50,000 without modeling turbulence, are icoDyMFoam and pimpleDyMFoam effectively the same solver?
|
|
May 28, 2012, 09:10 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
cfdkid
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 17 |
Well without turbulence then icoDyMFoam should be used.
__________________
________________________________________ Regards, CFDkid It never gets easier You just get Better |
|
October 2, 2012, 23:01 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Jerry Xue
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I am new to OpenFOAM, but shouldn't that be the same if the simulationType is set to laminar in the turbulenceProperties file for pimpleDyMFoam ?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help on segmentation fault with pimpleDyMFoam | ebah6 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | July 5, 2013 08:27 |
Problems scaling down the mesh of a stirred tank (GGI, icoDyMFoam) | Tobb | OpenFOAM | 2 | February 7, 2013 14:06 |
error with icoDyMFOAM; how to set face extrusion zones | kiyono | OpenFOAM | 1 | June 17, 2011 16:07 |
problem of icoDyMfoam | ranas | OpenFOAM | 1 | January 16, 2010 04:43 |
Running icoDyMFoam from FoamX | jdkummer | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | September 13, 2006 05:31 |