|
[Sponsors] |
Boundary conditions for LaunderGibsonRSTM discussion |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 26, 2012, 07:43 |
Boundary conditions for LaunderGibsonRSTM discussion
|
#1 |
Member
ms
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West London
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi everyone,
I've set up an incompressible, steady-state simulation of a static body in a freestream using the LaunderGibsonRSTM model for turbulence solving with simpleFoam and would like some discussion regarding appropriate boundary conditions. I am not using wall functions and have what I think is a good mesh of hexas in the boundary layer and tets outside. It is a half mesh, with symmetry on all walls except the input and output. At the moment I'm using the following boundaryField entries: 0/R: noslipwall{type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0 0 0 0);} inlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform (0 0 0 0 0 0};} symmetry{type symmetryPlane;} outlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform (0 0 0 0 0 0};} 0/U: noslipwall{type fixedValue; value uniform (0 0 0);} inlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform (10 0 0);} symmetry{type symmetryPlane;} outlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform (10 0 0);} 0/p: noslipwall{type zeroGradient;} inlet{type freestreamPressure;} symmetry{type symmetryPlane;} outlet{type freestreamPressure;} 0/epsilon: noslipwall{type fixedValue; value uniform 1E-10;} inlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform 0.13;} symmetry{type symmetryPlane;} outlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform 0.13;} 0/k: noslipwall{type fixedValue; value uniform 1E-10;} inlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform 0.1;} symmetry{type symmetryPlane;} outlet{type freestream; freestreamValue uniform 0.1;} 0/nut: noslipwall{type fixedValue; value uniform 1E-10;} inlet{type calculated; value uniform 0.22;} symmetry{type symmetryPlane;} outlet{type calculated; value uniform 0.22;} Do these boundary conditions seem reasonable? I'm using low relaxation values and the solution ticks for some time and then blows up with epsilon being bounded: this makes me doubt the boundary conditions; hence the request for discussion! Please, any comments about past working cases using this turbulence model would be greatly appreciated! As a footnote, I'm using the following solvers: U: smoothSolver. p: GAMG. epsilon: PBiCG. R: PBiCG. Best regards, Mark. Last edited by anothr_acc; April 26, 2012 at 10:27. |
|
April 27, 2012, 11:17 |
|
#2 |
Member
ms
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West London
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Equally, if somebody could give me a source of examples (other than $FOAM_TUTORIALS) I'd be happy to look further myself.
Best regards, Mark. |
|
April 30, 2012, 07:08 |
|
#3 |
Member
ms
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: West London
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 17 |
Also, I've refined my mesh through the boundary layer and I'd like to turn off the wall functions used with this turbulence model. I've changed my constant/polyMesh/boundary file from using `wall' at the walls of my body, to `patch' in an attempt to do this and set U, R,
epsilon, k, nut to zero; and p to zeroGradient. Is this the approach other people use to turn off the wall functions? Best regards, Mark. |
|
May 14, 2014, 18:54 |
|
#4 |
Member
CHARLES
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 13 |
Mark, did you ever figure this out? I'm having the same problem!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Impinging Jet Boundary Conditions | Anindya | Main CFD Forum | 25 | February 27, 2016 13:58 |
OpenFOAM Variable Velocity Boundary Conditions | NickolasPl | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | May 19, 2011 06:37 |
[Netgen] boundary conditions and mesh exporting | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | May 27, 2010 10:38 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |
A problem about setting boundary conditions | lyang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 19, 1999 19:29 |