|
[Sponsors] |
three questions regarding interFoam (basic but may confuse many people) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 2, 2010, 21:07 |
three questions regarding interFoam (basic but may confuse many people)
|
#1 |
Member
YS
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 96
Rep Power: 16 |
(1) for incompressible solvers, while discretizing momentum equations, why is the following term considered only when turbulence modelling is turned on:
- fvc::div(nuEff()*dev(fvc::grad(U)().T())) see : GenEddyVisc::divDevBeff(volVectorField& U) const 00091 { 00092 return 00093 ( 00094 - fvm::laplacian(nuEff(), U) - fvc::div(nuEff()*dev(fvc::grad(U)().T())) 00095 ); 00096 } (2) in pEqn.H of interFoam, the 'guess' fluxes phiU is first evaluated and then corrected, the question is, why the correction (and adjustment) is performed without considering the source terms (gravity, surface tension, etc.) (3) in UEqn.H : 00019 if (momentumPredictor) 00020 { 00021 solve 00022 ( 00023 UEqn 00024 == 00025 fvc::reconstruct 00026 ( 00027 fvc::interpolate(rho)*(g & mesh.Sf()) 00028 + ( 00029 fvc::interpolate(interface.sigmaK())*fvc::snGrad(a lpha1) 00030 - fvc::snGrad(p) 00031 ) * mesh.magSf() 00032 ) 00033 ); 00034 } The source terms are first computed at cell faces and then reconstructed to cell centres, why bothering? Why not just compute them at cell centre in the first place? Is there any special issue I missed out? Many Thanks! Last edited by Ya_Squall2010; April 6, 2010 at 07:42. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
total newbie - Basic Questions | caslor | Main CFD Forum | 9 | December 10, 2009 12:49 |
[OpenFOAM] Parafoam basic questions | qtian | ParaView | 0 | July 20, 2007 12:52 |
New user with some basic questions | york | OpenFOAM | 3 | November 10, 2006 19:17 |
some very basic questions | bomario | FLUENT | 0 | December 4, 2005 22:13 |
LES.. Basic Questions | NIK | Main CFD Forum | 8 | May 19, 2004 19:24 |