|
[Sponsors] |
June 24, 2024, 09:24 |
Adding quantity to lagrangian particles
|
#1 |
New Member
Christoph Wilms
Join Date: Jun 2024
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi everyone,
I am working with DPMFoam (v2012) to simulate a particle-laden turbulent duct flow using a direct numerical simulation. Adding the missing fvOptions support to the solver was straightforward, see How to add a source term for driving the flow in periodic model by DPMFoam? At the moment I am trying to add another quantity to the particles. So I looked up the place in the source code where the default quantities like diameter, rho, age, ... are defined. It is in the template base class KinematicCloud ($FOAM_SRC/lagrangian/intermediate/parcels/Templates/KinematicParcel). I duplicated the lines of 'age' in all four relevant files (KinematicParcel.C, KinematicParcel.H, KinematicParcelI.H, KinematicParcelIO.C) and renamed 'age' to 'myVar' (see attached files). Unfortunately, the solver crashes during the collision calculation: Code:
#0 Foam::error::printStack(Foam::Ostream&) at ??:? #1 Foam::sigSegv::sigHandler(int) at ??:? #2 ? in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #3 Foam::List<Foam::PairCollisionRecord<Foam::Vector<double> > >::doResize(int) at ??:? #4 Foam::CollisionRecordList<Foam::Vector<double>, Foam::Vector<double> >::matchPairRecord(int, int) at ??:? #5 Foam::PairSpringSliderDashpot<Foam::CollidingCloud<Foam::KinematicCloud<Foam::Cloud<Foam::CollidingParcel<Foam::KinematicParcel<Foam::particle> > > > > >::evaluatePair(Foam::CollidingParcel<Foam::KinematicParcel<Foam::particle> >&, Foam::CollidingParcel<Foam::KinematicParcel<Foam::particle> >&) const at ??:? #6 Foam::PairCollision<Foam::CollidingCloud<Foam::KinematicCloud<Foam::Cloud<Foam::CollidingParcel<Foam::KinematicParcel<Foam::particle> > > > > >::realRealInteraction() at ??:? #7 Foam::PairCollision<Foam::CollidingCloud<Foam::KinematicCloud<Foam::Cloud<Foam::CollidingParcel<Foam::KinematicParcel<Foam::particle> > > > > >::parcelInteraction() at ??:? #8 Foam::PairCollision<Foam::CollidingCloud<Foam::KinematicCloud<Foam::Cloud<Foam::CollidingParcel<Foam::KinematicParcel<Foam::particle> > > > > >::collide() at ??:? #9 ? in ~/OpenFOAM/wilms02-v2012/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/myDPMFoam #10 ? in ~/OpenFOAM/wilms02-v2012/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/myDPMFoam #11 ? in ~/OpenFOAM/wilms02-v2012/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/myDPMFoam #12 ? in ~/OpenFOAM/wilms02-v2012/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/myDPMFoam #13 ? in ~/OpenFOAM/wilms02-v2012/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/myDPMFoam #14 ? in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #15 __libc_start_main in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 #16 ? in ~/OpenFOAM/wilms02-v2012/platforms/linux64GccDPInt32Opt/bin/myDPMFoam Segmentation fault I also changed the order of the variables, as the following thread gives the hint that the order in the constructor should solve the problem, for me without success: Adding Properties to Lagrangian Particle - IOstream problems Also, when I use the MPPICFoam solver instead of DPMFoam, the calculation runs without errors, but 'myVar' is not saved in the time steps. Unluckily, the solver crashes in debug mode even without modifications: Code:
--> FOAM FATAL ERROR: (openfoam-2012) Tensor is not invertible due to the zero determinant:det(Tensor) = 3.60858e-20 From Foam::Tensor<Cmpt> Foam::inv(const Foam::Tensor<Cmpt>&, Cmpt) [with Cmpt = double] in file /home/wilms02/OpenFOAM/OpenFOAM-v2012/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude/TensorI.H at line 738. Does anyone have any idea how to solve this problem or how to implement a new Lagrangian set? Thanks in advance and best regards Christoph |
|
June 27, 2024, 08:41 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Christoph Wilms
Join Date: Jun 2024
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I tried the same approach in different OpenFOAM versions with the following results
v2012: The problem described above v2312: Same as v2012 v8: Same as v2012 v11: It works without problems I haven't tested it, but I think it should work from v9 onwards, as the lagrangian library has been restructured in v9 (the intermediate folder no longer exists). However, I would still prefer the esi version as it does not write the particles in barycentric coordinate format (which cannot be read by paraview). |
|
Tags |
kinematiccloud, lagrangian, particle |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looping Over Active Lagrangian Particles | cjc96 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | March 2, 2021 02:56 |
Radiation heating of lagrangian particles in reactingParcelFoam | CHUIKOV | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 28, 2021 15:53 |
multiRegionHeater error | ordinary | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | June 9, 2020 18:43 |
How to get Path lines for lagrangian particles? | vidyadhar | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 0 | January 31, 2017 06:38 |
chtMultiRegionSimpleFoam | samiam1000 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 39 | March 31, 2016 09:43 |