CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Programming & Development

Dual Grid Multiphase solver Development like M.Hermann' RGLS

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 5, 2021, 03:20
Default Dual Grid Multiphase solver Development like M.Hermann' RGLS
  #1
Senior Member
 
krishna kant
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Hyderabad, India
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10
kk415 is on a distinguished road
Hello All,

I am trying to develop a multiphase flow solver where the concept is to solve the advection equation of VOF on a finer mesh than the Navier Stokes mesh. So as a very basic problem I am solving the RayleighPlateau Instability problem with zero surface tension coefficient.

The finer mesh and coarser mesh are also kept identical currently. So all I am doing is copying the coarse mesh field of Velocity 'U' and Flux 'phi' from coarse mesh to Finer Mesh. 'UF' is identical to 'U' and 'phiF' is identical to 'phi'.

Code:
{
Info<< "Interpolating Flux Field from Coarser to Finer Mesh using Gradient method" << endl;
volTensorField gradU(fvc::grad(U));
forAll(LSMesh.cells(), cellI2){ 
UF[cellI2].component(0)=U[tmpList[cellI2]].component(0)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(0)*r[cellI2].component(0)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(1)*r[cellI2].component(1)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(2)*r[cellI2].component(2);
UF[cellI2].component(1)=U[tmpList[cellI2]].component(1)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(3)*r[cellI2].component(0)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(4)*r[cellI2].component(1)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(5)*r[cellI2].component(2);
UF[cellI2].component(2)=U[tmpList[cellI2]].component(2)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(6)*r[cellI2].component(0)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(7)*r[cellI2].component(1)+gradU[tmpList[cellI2]].component(8)*r[cellI2].component(2);
}
//phiF = linearInterpolate(UF) & LSMesh.Sf();
//Info << phi << endl;
forAll(phiF(), iFace){     //Method2
//Info << LSMesh.Cf()[iFace] << tab << mesh.Cf()[iFace] << endl;
    //const label& leftcellFine = LSMesh.owner()[iFace];
    //const label& rightcellFine = LSMesh.neighbour()[iFace];
    //if (WVolList[leftcellFine] < 1){
    //    phiF[iFace] = 1e-20;
    //}
    //else {
        phiF[iFace] = phi[iFace];
    //}
}

/*forAll (LSMesh.boundaryMesh() , ipatch ) {
    if( (LSMesh.boundaryMesh()[ipatch].type() == "empty") || (LSMesh.boundaryMesh()[ipatch].type() == "symmetry")){
    }
    else{
        const polyPatch& cPatch = LSMesh.boundaryMesh()[ipatch];
        forAll(cPatch, facei){
        label iFaceGlobal = facei + LSMesh.boundaryMesh()[ipatch].start();
        phiF[iFaceGlobal] = phi[iFaceGlobal];
        //Info << iFaceGlobal << tab << phi[iFaceGlobal] << tab << phiF[iFaceGlobal] << endl;
        }
    }
}*/

}
r is a zero vector currently. The resultant alpha is field is brought back from the fine mesh to coarse mesh as volume average using the following code

Code:
if(LSMesh.cells().size()>=mesh.cells().size())
{
//gradPsi == 0*gradPsi;
alpha1 == 0*alpha1;
Info<< "Interpolation from finer to coarser mesh" << endl;
forAll(LSMesh.cells(), cellI){
alpha1[tmpList[cellI]]=alpha1[tmpList[cellI]]+WVolList[cellI]*alpha1F[cellI];}
//C[tmpList[cellI]]=C[tmpList[cellI]]+WVolList[cellI]*C_f[cellI];}
}
WVolList is a unit scalar here and tmpList[cellI]=cellI.

Still the result is different in the current solver from both isoAdvector and MULES. The result picture is attached. It seems there is issue with the boundary treatment. Can anyone suggest what possibly be wrong here.

Boundary Condition for alpha:

Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| =========                 |                                                 |
| \\      /  F ield         | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox           |
|  \\    /   O peration     | Version:  2.3.0                                 |
|   \\  /    A nd           | Web:      www.OpenFOAM.org                      |
|    \\/     M anipulation  |                                                 |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
    version     2.0;
    format      ascii;
    class       volScalarField;
    object      alpha.water;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

dimensions      [0 0 0 0 0 0 0];

internalField   uniform 0;

boundaryField
{
    /*bottom
    {
        type            cyclic;
    }

    top
    {
        type            cyclic;//
    }

    left
    {
        type            cyclic;//
    }
    right
    {
        type            cyclic;//
    }*/
    symmetry
    {
        type            symmetry;
    }
    atmosphere
    {
        type            zeroGradient;
    }
    front
    {
        type            empty;
    }
    back
    {
        type            empty;
    }
}

// ************************************************************************* //
Needless to say the case setup works fine on single grid solver.
Attached Images
File Type: png result.png (15.1 KB, 6 views)
kk415 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
dual grid, interfoam, multiphase flows


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
On grid independent solution for pulsatile flow David FLUENT 5 March 25, 2022 04:33
Poisson solver - orthogonal grid Fuka Main CFD Forum 0 May 11, 2006 12:19
CFX 5.5 Roued CFX 1 October 2, 2001 17:49
Dual grid structure - enlightment ?? Jens Main CFD Forum 2 August 1, 2000 19:01
matrix solver about block structured grid young min, Sohn Main CFD Forum 1 July 11, 2000 20:35


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:56.