Why the convergence of a steady problem also need several time evolution steps

ywem · June 9, 2020, 04:42

Dear Foamers,

I found that if we solve a steady problem such as that using "simpleFoam", whereas the convergence of it also need several time steps. I am not sure if this is a general conclusion. I checked this using the tutorials of "incompressible/simpleFoam/airFoil2D" in OpenFOAM.

If this is true, is it mean that we have to use two times when solving a transient problem, one is for the evolution within another time step. I am confused about this. Dose anyone has some ideas?

sourav90 · June 15, 2020, 06:03

Hi,

You are right, there are 2 different times to be considered in transient problem. Whereas for any steady-state only one.

I have never run in the transient simulation, only have worked with steady-state problems so far. As far as I know, this stems from courant number consideration, which is important for transient but need not be considered for steady-state. I can share some links that might be useful:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couran...Lewy_condition

Courant Number

PS: I am new to CFD simulation, experienced users don't hesitate to correct me if I am unclear / wrong.

ywem · June 15, 2020, 20:03

Dear Sourav,
Thank you for your reply.
I am not sure with this. But there is no second time in some transients solver such as pisoFoam in OpenFOAM.

June 9, 2020, 04:42	Why the convergence of a steady problem also need several time evolution steps	#1
ywem Member Wenming Yang Join Date: Jun 2018 Posts: 42 Rep Power: 8	Dear Foamers, I found that if we solve a steady problem such as that using "simpleFoam", whereas the convergence of it also need several time steps. I am not sure if this is a general conclusion. I checked this using the tutorials of "incompressible/simpleFoam/airFoil2D" in OpenFOAM. If this is true, is it mean that we have to use two times when solving a transient problem, one is for the evolution within another time step. I am confused about this. Dose anyone has some ideas?

June 15, 2020, 06:03	transient and steady-state: 2 & 1 time consideration respectively	#2
sourav90 Member Sourav Mandal Join Date: Jul 2019 Posts: 55 Rep Power: 7	Hi, You are right, there are 2 different times to be considered in transient problem. Whereas for any steady-state only one. I have never run in the transient simulation, only have worked with steady-state problems so far. As far as I know, this stems from courant number consideration, which is important for transient but need not be considered for steady-state. I can share some links that might be useful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couran...Lewy_condition Courant Number PS: I am new to CFD simulation, experienced users don't hesitate to correct me if I am unclear / wrong.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
AMI speed performance	danny123	OpenFOAM	21	October 24, 2020 05:13
pressure in incompressible solvers e.g. simpleFoam	chrizzl	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	13	March 28, 2017 06:49
Stuck in a Rut- interDyMFoam!	xoitx	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	14	March 25, 2016 08:09
Floating point exception error	lpz_michele	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	53	October 19, 2015 03:50
Low Mixing time Problem	Mavier	CFX	5	April 29, 2013 01:00

June 15, 2020, 20:03		#3
ywem Member Wenming Yang Join Date: Jun 2018 Posts: 42 Rep Power: 8	Dear Sourav, Thank you for your reply. I am not sure with this. But there is no second time in some transients solver such as pisoFoam in OpenFOAM.