|
[Sponsors] |
Why do the laplacian mesh motion solvers solve for the cell centres? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 1, 2020, 00:56 |
Why do the laplacian mesh motion solvers solve for the cell centres?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 8 |
In the displacementLaplacian and velocityLaplacian motion solvers, if I'm understanding the code correctly, the motion of the boundaries (provided by the user in the pointMotion file) is interpolated onto the centres of the boundary cells. Then the laplace equation equation is solved for the displacement/velocity of the cell centres. The new position of the mesh nodes is then interpolated from the cell centres. Is this correct? If it is, why not just directly solve for the displacements of the mesh nodes? Then you don't need to interpolate.
|
|
May 4, 2020, 18:57 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 8 |
||
Tags |
center, centre, mesh motion, moving mesh, velocitylaplacian |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
[mesh manipulation] How to write cellSet for different regions in constant/polyMesh/sets | Struggle_Achieve | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | June 17, 2019 10:29 |
How to use "translation" in solidBodyMotionFunction in OpenFOAM | rupesh_w | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | August 16, 2016 05:27 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |