|
[Sponsors] |
Give U().boundaryField()[PatchID()].patchInternalField value of cell centroid? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 17, 2019, 09:57 |
Give U().boundaryField()[PatchID()].patchInternalField value of cell centroid?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7 |
Hallo everyone,
As the title says, does U().boundaryField()[PatchID()].patchInternalField give the velocity value of the cell centroid of all boundary cells? Or does it give the value of the corresponding face? patchInternalField sounds so centoidish Thanks, Paul |
|
July 17, 2019, 15:30 |
|
#2 |
New Member
RobinZ
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello Paul,
in the source guide the class is described as: Variation of sampledPatch that samples the internalField (at a given normal distance from the patch) instead of the patchField. So your speculation seems right. Kind regards Robin |
|
July 18, 2019, 06:15 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7 |
Hey Robin,
Thank you! Bye Paul |
|
July 23, 2019, 07:14 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7 |
Hey, me again.
I was wondering what's the difference between returning tau()().boundaryField()[PatchID()] and tau()().boundaryField()[PatchID()].patchInternalField() both give you a symmTensorField, right? Thanks guys, Paul |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
find a cell from its centroid coordinates | annan | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 2 | March 5, 2018 07:36 |
calculate distance from wall to neighbourig cell centroid | rr123 | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 39 | March 14, 2017 02:41 |
How to give the coordinates of the centroid of a parabolic profil in UDF | djing | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 1 | December 5, 2016 04:11 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |
radius of each cell centroid | Bikash | FLUENT | 0 | March 3, 2005 17:33 |