|
[Sponsors] |
Is MULES the right choice for modified transport equation? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 25, 2019, 06:05 |
Is MULES the right choice for modified transport equation?
|
#1 |
New Member
Elisabeth Diehl
Join Date: Jun 2019
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi everybody,
I want to solve the following modified transport equation for the calculation of sensitivities: Within interFoam, I implemented the the following code right after solving alphaEqn.H (along with initial fields dAlpha and dU, calculation of dPhi and other modifications): Code:
{ word dAlphaScheme("div(phi,dAlpha)"); word dPhiScheme("div(dPhi,alpha)"); #include "alphaSuSp.H" surfaceScalarField dAlphaPhi ( fvc::flux(phi, dAlpha, dAlphaScheme) + fvc::flux(dPhi, alpha1, dPhiScheme) ); MULES::explicitSolve ( geometricOneField(), dAlpha, dAlphaPhi, Sp, Su ); } |
|
Tags |
mules, sensitivities, transport equation |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Source Term due to evaporation in energy transport equation | styleworker | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 3 | September 7, 2022 04:09 |
Boundary conditions for a newly added transport equation | Divyaprakash | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | May 2, 2016 06:32 |
turbulent diffusion term in transport equation for additional variables | Raijin Thunderkeg | CFX | 2 | May 17, 2014 23:53 |
One transport equation, two user-defined scalar, can it be solved? | sharonyue | FLUENT | 0 | April 1, 2014 23:18 |
error message | cuteapathy | CFX | 14 | March 20, 2012 07:45 |