|
[Sponsors] |
Why is wmake insufficient to effect the changes I want made in a library? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 16, 2017, 17:37 |
Why is wmake insufficient to effect the changes I want made in a library?
|
#1 |
New Member
Clint
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
I have been working on implementing some new combustion stuff for a multiphase solver. One of my debugging tactics is to change some of the source to print out variables of interest so i can be sure what is happening.
The usual workflow depending on how the library is built into the solver (run time selectable (rts) or not) is
Currently I am working with a slightly modified version of coalChemistryFoam (OF v. 4.1) and modifying the laminar.C file in the combustion library (so the laminar combustion model). When I modify laminar.C and wmake the combustion library the changes are not make to the library and do not show up when I run my solver (even if I recompile the solver, which shouldn't matter I think because the combustion model is rts). However if I wclean the library after making/saving my changes to laminar.C and then I wmake I can see that the changes have been made to the library when I run my solver. Why am I having to wclean it in this situation when normally just recompiling with wmake will work? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ImmersedBoundary] Immersed Boundary Method in OpenFOAM-3.1-ext | miladrakhsha | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 106 | July 3, 2023 10:26 |
tailor made class, wmake libso successfully, but run failed. | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 1 | November 20, 2014 21:49 |
Having problems building source code when using wmake | Carla | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 4 | November 3, 2014 03:15 |
Problems Installing OF 1.6 32 bit | bucksfan | OpenFOAM Installation | 19 | August 4, 2009 01:36 |
Can OpenFoam be made faster or which Math kernel library is used | jens_klostermann | OpenFOAM | 0 | February 4, 2008 08:37 |