|
[Sponsors] |
How to? Extra term in k-e equation. Implicit-Explicit |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 15, 2013, 08:48 |
How to? Extra term in k-e equation. Implicit-Explicit
|
#1 | |||
Senior Member
M. Montero
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
I am trying to implement a canopy model into OF. With respect to the momentum equation, I am seeing several post where the code was similar to the following one: Quote:
I have introduced the following ones: Quote:
Quote:
Is correct my implementation? what is the advantages to take the extra terms as implicit in the k and epsilon equation with respect to take them as explicit terms? Quick Convergence? Stability? Thank you very much for your time. |
||||
March 19, 2013, 11:50 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
M. Montero
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Madrid
Posts: 155
Rep Power: 17 |
Ok, It seems according to the other topic that it is related to the stability of the equations...
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
lid-driven cavity in matlab using BiCGStab | Don456 | Main CFD Forum | 1 | January 19, 2012 16:00 |
Source term energy equation for reactive flows | DaIN | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 6, 2011 16:11 |
Large source term in species equation | MACFD | FLUENT | 4 | January 4, 2011 15:16 |
Extra term in Epsilon equation | Valdemir G. Ferreira | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 30, 2000 09:57 |
bouyancy term in epsilon equation | Michael | Main CFD Forum | 1 | June 25, 1999 11:20 |