|
[Sponsors] |
why UEqn.H of buoyantSimpleFoam has no gravity term? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 14, 2013, 16:50 |
why UEqn.H of buoyantSimpleFoam has no gravity term?
|
#1 |
Member
yijin Mao
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 16 |
This might be silly question, but it confused me a lot..
these snippet code comes from buoyantSimpleFoam of OpenFOAM-2.1.1 3 tmp<fvVectorMatrix> UEqn 4 ( 5 fvm::div(phi, U) 6 + turbulence->divDevRhoReff(U) 7 ); 8 9 UEqn().relax(); 10 11 if (simple.momentumPredictor()) 12 { 13 solve 14 ( 15 UEqn() 16 == 17 fvc::reconstruct 18 ( 19 ( 20 - ghf*fvc::snGrad(rho) 21 - fvc::snGrad(p_rgh) 22 )*mesh.magSf() 23 ) 24 ); 25 } shouldn't be this? 3 tmp<fvVectorMatrix> UEqn 4 ( 5 fvm::div(phi, U) 6 + turbulence->divDevRhoReff(U) 7 ); 8 9 UEqn().relax(); 10 11 if (simple.momentumPredictor()) 12 { 13 solve 14 ( 15 UEqn() 16 == 17 fvc::reconstruct 18 ( 19 ( 20 - ghf*fvc::snGrad(rho) 21 - fvc::snGrad(p_rgh) 22 )*mesh.magSf() 23 ) 24 + rho*g 25 ); 25 } |
|
January 14, 2013, 17:38 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 |
No, the gravity term is hidden in between the usage of p_rgh and ghf*snGrad(rho). There is a thread on the forum with the derivation.
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. |
|
January 14, 2013, 18:12 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 |
For bouyancy driven flows that is why we use p_rgh instead of p. If prgh = p + rho*g*h, then when we do grad p in the NS equations we get grad(p) and rho*g. I don't do a lot of buoyancy driven flow so I'm not 100% on the notation.
|
|
January 14, 2013, 18:14 |
|
#4 |
Member
yijin Mao
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 16 |
thanks for your reply.
I derived, but may not correctly, so I did not see the term of rho*gravity. How can I find that thread? some keywords are quite helpful. |
|
January 14, 2013, 18:18 |
|
#5 |
Member
yijin Mao
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 16 |
Thanks! I got the idea. I mistakenly took grad(rho*g*h) = grad(rho)*g*h without caring rho*g*grad(h), which equals to rho*g. Shame on me!
|
|
January 15, 2013, 03:53 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Anton Kidess
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,377
Rep Power: 30 |
Quote:
http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...tml#post323761
__________________
*On twitter @akidTwit *Spend as much time formulating your questions as you expect people to spend on their answer. |
||
October 22, 2013, 14:35 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Christiano Molossi
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 13 |
Hello!
I'm new to OpenFOAM, I started using about 1 month ago. And I have created and account here just now. So i didn't know if it was better to create a new topic or just replay an old one since my doubt is related to this topic. So, I'm working on a simulation with the twoLiquidMixingFoam solver. And just like the UEqn.H posted here before, there is this: * mesh.magSf(). I would like to know what it is, what does it for? What this meaning? Besides this, I want to learn the mathematical modelling form OpenFOAM, for example, in twoLiquidMixingFoam, what is the equations that the solver use to run? If someone could me introduce to a book or anything that may help me to understand the math from this software I would be very thankful. Best regards! |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass source term in buoyantSimpleFoam | OMN | OpenFOAM | 1 | April 30, 2014 07:49 |
Gravity source term in PisoFoam | DanM | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | May 24, 2013 12:30 |
Gravity source term in PisoFoam | DanM | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 28, 2012 13:59 |
Laplacian term missing in simpleFoam - UEqn.H | Balakrshnan Ramakrishnan | OpenFOAM | 2 | April 5, 2011 11:58 |
ATTENTION! Reliability problems in CFX 5.7 | Joseph | CFX | 14 | April 20, 2010 16:45 |