|
[Sponsors] |
The answers of the case tutorialsstressFemFoamplateHole seems wrong |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 23, 2006, 05:54 |
I execute the origional case o
|
#1 |
New Member
dandes.Huang
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 17 |
I execute the origional case of the tutorials ,it generates 1000 elements (u can investigate CH2.2 in the prommer's guide ). but the numbers of the rsults(include sigmaxx,sigmayy,sigmaxy) are much larger than 1000 . Even the value is unreasonable . I think the functuin of finiteFemFoam is not exact , right ? and can u tell me the arguments of the finiteFemFoam solver , because the origional Fvsolution dosen't have the finiteFemFoam codes(i compared with the stressedFoam case). sincerely ^^
|
|
March 23, 2006, 06:35 |
You have to be very careful -
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Hrvoje Jasak
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,906
Rep Power: 33 |
You have to be very careful - the FEM solver has been implemented by my colleague Dr. Zeljko Tukovic and myself and has been validated in detail in his PhD Thesis. The solver is correct and there are no implementation errors, especially not to the magnitude you describe.
My guess is that you either do not understand the results you are looking at (e.g. the mesh is 3-D) or that you have messed up the boundary conditions or the material properties. Hrv
__________________
Hrvoje Jasak Providing commercial FOAM/OpenFOAM and CFD Consulting: http://wikki.co.uk |
|
March 23, 2006, 08:32 |
thx so much . But can u explai
|
#3 |
New Member
dandes.Huang
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 17 |
thx so much . But can u explain the numbers of the results ? 1000 elements should be versus 1000 values (like 1000 sigmaxx , 1000 sigmaxy ...etc), isn't it ? But my results contain 7212 values for each kind of stress , isn't it ? Hence , i got incorrest results when my answers convert to VTK form (i guess),so i can't present my paragragf on paraview . please provide the thoughts in detail for me , thank you very much .
|
|
March 24, 2006, 03:31 |
The FEM solver decomposes the
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Mattijs Janssens
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,419
Rep Power: 26 |
The FEM solver decomposes the cells into tetrahedra. You are probably seeing the fields on the decomposed mesh and postprocessing those is probably not yet added to paraFoam/foamToVTK. dxFoam does so see if you can get a 1.2 version of it or use 1.1.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
help! sth wrong while reading case | xuan | FLUENT | 1 | May 21, 2007 02:01 |
what's wrong with my case?????? | zhu | FLUENT | 0 | August 2, 2006 09:58 |
[OpenFOAM] Why dosnbt it work on paraview when inputing the results of the case tutorialsstr | dandes | ParaView | 3 | March 22, 2006 11:06 |
CFX FAQ Started - Fill it With Questions/Answers | Jonas Larsson | CFX | 0 | September 12, 2005 10:14 |
Different answers | heydari | FLUENT | 4 | February 25, 2003 04:04 |