|
[Sponsors] |
July 2, 2007, 06:04 |
Hey all,
for a turbulence s
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hey all,
for a turbulence simulation using the k-epsilon model I also have to consider wall functions. Comparing the pitzDaily example with simulations of cfx a strange difference at the upper wall (where the wall distance is reducing again) appeared. In the simulation with openFoam the the velocity near the wall was about 50% of the inflow, in contrast to cfx where the velocity was almost zero in that area. One point I recognized is that the steady state solutions of cfx and of differ and cfx seems to stop much earlier. But after all I think the difference at the upper wall is also due to the wall functions. I've read that OF uses the nu_T wall function, in contrast to cfx which uses scalable wall functions. First, is there a big difference between both and second can I find more information about the wall functions used in OF? Is there a way to use almost the same wall functions? Cheers Florian |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
wall functions near slanting wall | Pankaj | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 11, 2008 10:50 |
LES with wall functions, wall boundary, Re 10000 | subba | CFX | 4 | July 10, 2007 06:04 |
Wall Functions | adam | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | August 31, 2006 10:18 |
damping functions(wall functions) | Pr | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 22, 2004 03:17 |
abt near wall turbulence wall functions | amv | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 12, 2003 04:38 |