|
[Sponsors] |
Specifying U k and Epsilon boundary condition |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 14, 2008, 03:48 |
Well,
1) yes, i found it so
|
#1 | |
New Member
Ravi Ramalho
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Recife, PE, Brazil
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 17 |
Well,
1) yes, i found it somewhere. 2) reading another example carefully, I realize that faceCentreshub was not a class, but a variable that needs to be declared.const fvPatchVectorField& faceCentreshub = mesh.Cf().boundaryField()[inletPatchID]; should do the trick. 3) I think the problem was in createFields.H, where the fields are actually created/declared. Adding the following lines and I think it's ok: Quote:
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
k-epsilon boundary conditions in CFX 11 | Ricardo Rezende | CFX | 1 | August 26, 2007 19:44 |
RANS-Sim. of airfoil: inlet condition of epsilon? | Norman Cook | Main CFD Forum | 3 | November 19, 2006 12:30 |
Boundary condition of the third kind or Danckwertz boundary condition | plage | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 4 | October 3, 2006 13:21 |
Wall Boundary Condition in k - epsilon model | abhijeet vaidya | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 14, 2002 04:18 |
boundary conditions for K and Epsilon | Hicham | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 3, 2001 01:22 |