|
[Sponsors] |
Multiphase flow in cavity---B.C. doesn't correspond to physical meaning |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 12, 2016, 16:02 |
Multiphase flow in cavity---B.C. doesn't correspond to physical meaning
|
#1 |
Member
Linyan X
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear OpenFOAMers,
I have one question regarding the B.C setting while using 'interFoam' solver. I created one cavity for 2D simulation with left, right, top, lower walls are all set as 'type wall'. I hope 'no-slip' condition would work in this boundary setting. Therefore, I set the velocity at left, right, top, lower walls as 'type fixed value' in '0/U' file and set pressure as zeroGradient in '0/p_rgh'. The simulation does work, however, according to the animation of the result. I think it totally lost the physical meaning. Because I found the fluid at the wall will move up and down with time and this absolutely violated the physical meaning of 'type wall' which means 'no-slip' at the wall. Does someone have any comment on this problem? Any correction is highly appreciated!!! Thanks in advance, Linyan |
|
December 13, 2016, 17:11 |
|
#2 |
Member
Linyan X
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 10 |
After changing the left and right's B.C. into 'cyclic'. The motion of the fluid keep steady on the wall. And that is the desired motion for the gravity wave. However, it still didn't make sense that the boundary type 'wall' would not work. A little bit confused about that.
Linyan |
|
December 14, 2016, 18:17 |
Solved
|
#3 |
Member
Linyan X
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 10 |
The problem was solved.
The reason credits to my ignorance of the 'wall' effect. Initially, I didn't believe the openfoam's result for the gravity wave period time doesn't follow my theoretical calculation. However, then the fault was caused by ignorance of the 'wall' effect. If the model has the wall, the behavior of the wave will be affected by the reflection of gravity wave by the wall(additionally). That is the reason for simulation with 'type wall' didn't follow my calculation. While at the same time, it did work under the B.C. 'type cyclic'. Linyan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Help: apply B.C. in my granular flow model ? | Derek Jing | FLUENT | 1 | January 8, 2020 22:38 |
Internal Flow - Physical Design | Blooper | SU2 | 2 | August 12, 2014 19:38 |
Multiphase Flow BC-Mass Flow inlet not available? | yimingchen.ok@gmail.com | Siemens | 1 | July 18, 2014 07:08 |
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows? | diaw | Main CFD Forum | 104 | February 16, 2006 06:44 |
Mass flow inlet B.C. at exit... | Jack Keays | FLUENT | 2 | October 6, 2000 09:39 |