CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

Multiphase flow in cavity---B.C. doesn't correspond to physical meaning

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 12, 2016, 16:02
Arrow Multiphase flow in cavity---B.C. doesn't correspond to physical meaning
  #1
Member
 
Linyan X
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 10
linyanx is on a distinguished road
Dear OpenFOAMers,

I have one question regarding the B.C setting while using 'interFoam' solver.

I created one cavity for 2D simulation with left, right, top, lower walls are all set as 'type wall'. I hope 'no-slip' condition would work in this boundary setting. Therefore, I set the velocity at left, right, top, lower walls as 'type fixed value' in '0/U' file and set pressure as zeroGradient in '0/p_rgh'. The simulation does work, however, according to the animation of the result. I think it totally lost the physical meaning. Because I found the fluid at the wall will move up and down with time and this absolutely violated the physical meaning of 'type wall' which means 'no-slip' at the wall.

Does someone have any comment on this problem? Any correction is highly appreciated!!!

Thanks in advance,

Linyan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Capture.JPG (18.0 KB, 9 views)
linyanx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 13, 2016, 17:11
Question
  #2
Member
 
Linyan X
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 10
linyanx is on a distinguished road
After changing the left and right's B.C. into 'cyclic'. The motion of the fluid keep steady on the wall. And that is the desired motion for the gravity wave. However, it still didn't make sense that the boundary type 'wall' would not work. A little bit confused about that.

Linyan
linyanx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 14, 2016, 18:17
Smile Solved
  #3
Member
 
Linyan X
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 10
linyanx is on a distinguished road
The problem was solved.

The reason credits to my ignorance of the 'wall' effect. Initially, I didn't believe the openfoam's result for the gravity wave period time doesn't follow my theoretical calculation.

However, then the fault was caused by ignorance of the 'wall' effect. If the model has the wall, the behavior of the wave will be affected by the reflection of gravity wave by the wall(additionally).

That is the reason for simulation with 'type wall' didn't follow my calculation. While at the same time, it did work under the B.C. 'type cyclic'.

Linyan
linyanx is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help: apply B.C. in my granular flow model ? Derek Jing FLUENT 1 January 8, 2020 22:38
Internal Flow - Physical Design Blooper SU2 2 August 12, 2014 19:38
Multiphase Flow BC-Mass Flow inlet not available? yimingchen.ok@gmail.com Siemens 1 July 18, 2014 07:08
Can 'shock waves' occur in viscous fluid flows? diaw Main CFD Forum 104 February 16, 2006 06:44
Mass flow inlet B.C. at exit... Jack Keays FLUENT 2 October 6, 2000 09:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:04.