|
[Sponsors] |
Can someone check my BCs for p & U for a 3D aerofoil simulation, please? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 18, 2015, 14:16 |
Can someone check my BCs for p & U for a 3D aerofoil simulation, please?
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi FOAMers,
I try to simulate a wing flying in the air using potentialFoam (I assume I have to use it if I want to run a simple Euler run?!). I did have a look at the tutorials for the motorbike and 2dmoving wing in order to get the BCs right. However I am still not entirely sure about the BCs (see attachment) in the 0/p and 0/U file as the results I am getting are funny. Especially for p which ranges from 0 to 1e-16. Hope someone can help me out. |
|
February 19, 2015, 05:10 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
I cannot see anything weird with your boundary conditions, so I guess you ran potentialFoam without the -writep option, which only outputs a velocity field. Rerun you potentialFoam as: Code:
$> potentialFoam - writep Just make sure you copy your 0 folder to 0.org, so you still have all the original files. Regards, Tom |
|
February 19, 2015, 09:13 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi Tom,
thank you for the quick reply! I have done what you told me but the results seem still weird. I have attached a screen shot of my p "distribution". |
|
February 19, 2015, 09:51 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
Hi what is the output from the solver?
|
|
February 19, 2015, 10:15 |
|
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi
for p I get as result: Code:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\ | ========= | | | \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox | | \\ / O peration | Version: 2.3.0 | | \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org | | \\/ M anipulation | | \*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class volScalarField; location "0"; object p; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // dimensions [0 2 -2 0 0 0 0]; internalField nonuniform List<scalar> 4528698 ( 62.2165 59.0258 55.8351 52.6444 49.4538 46.2632 43.0726 39.882 36.6914 33.5008 30.3102 27.1196 23.9291 20.7385 17.548 14.3574 11.1669 7.97634 4.78581 1.59527 62.2165 59.0258 55.8351 52.6444 49.4538 46.2632 43.0726 39.882 36.6914 33.5008 30.3102 27.1196 23.9291 20.7385 17.548 14.3574 11.1669 7.97634 4.78581 1.59527 62.2165 59.0258 55.8351 52.6444 49.4538 46.2632 43.0725 39.8819 36.6914 33.5008 30.3102 27.1196 23.9291 20.7385 17.548 14.3574 11.1669 7.97634 4.78581 1.59527 62.2164 59.0258 55.8351 52.6444 49.4538 46.2632 43.0725 39.8819 36.6913 33.5008 30.3102 27.1196 23.9291 ... ... ... |
|
February 19, 2015, 10:21 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
|
Did you open the ParaView screen before running the case? Than you should refresh the data in ParaView (via properties of foam.foam) and than rescale to the full range (via your clip).
|
|
February 19, 2015, 10:45 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 13 |
I have created a foam.foam file which I always open up after I have run a simulation. Than I close it again and run another one. I tried to refresh it but it doesn't change anything :-/
|
|
February 19, 2015, 10:55 |
|
#8 |
Senior Member
|
In ParaView can you select the cell values instead of the point values?
You could try to decompose the case and open the decomposed case in ParaView, but it should not be necessary. If that does not work, maybe you can put the data somewhere available to other so we can have a look ourselves. Regards, Tom |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
inlet and outlet BCs for airfoil simulation | michel1988 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | July 9, 2013 12:12 |
Fan simulation divergence | ayothicfd | CFX | 18 | July 20, 2012 06:53 |
Problems in compiling paraview in Suse 10.3 platform | chiven | OpenFOAM Installation | 3 | December 1, 2009 08:21 |
Replacing mesh while running a simulation | akultane | CFX | 1 | November 15, 2009 14:46 |
Difficult BCs about Freesurface Simulation by VOF | Yongguang Cheng | FLUENT | 0 | September 19, 2003 08:39 |