|
[Sponsors] |
The -parallel parameter of mapFields utility in OpenFOAM v2.3.0 |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 15, 2014, 07:44 |
The -parallel parameter of mapFields utility in OpenFOAM v2.3.0
|
#1 |
Member
Yao Lu
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 13 |
I performed a case which time ranged from 0s to 200s with sparse grid(192000 cells) on 4 processors.
Then, a geometry with better grid(576000 cells) and same BCs was established. Code:
mapFields -consistent <dir> Code:
mapFields -consistent <dir> -parallel Code:
mpirun -np 4 mapFields -consistent <dir> -parallel Is there someone knows how to speed up mapFields with parallel mode? My OpenFOAM is 2.3.0. Thanks in advance. shoxue |
|
April 28, 2014, 06:59 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Olivier
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France, grenoble
Posts: 272
Rep Power: 18 |
hello,
There is a lot of change in the mapFields for 2.3. (and we lost the ability to map from single to parallel case and the opposite). If you want to keep the old map method (faster), use option "-mapMethod mapNearest". But for me there is a regression with mapField, so i use the 2.2 version for this tools. regards, olivier |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running Error using Compressible OpenFoam Parallel mode | dhendria | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | February 13, 2014 21:53 |
OpenFOAM doesn't run in parallel | callumso | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | July 11, 2013 13:17 |
Something weird encountered when running OpenFOAM in parallel on multiple nodes | xpqiu | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | May 2, 2013 05:59 |
Purpose of the -parallel parameter | GerhardHolzinger | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | March 29, 2012 06:56 |
OpenFOAM 2.0.0. and 2.0.1 doesn't work in parallel mode | rv82 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | October 3, 2011 11:47 |