|
[Sponsors] |
April 11, 2014, 10:53 |
snappyHexMesh in parallel with AMI
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Did anyone successfully run snappyHexMesh in parallel on a mesh which has AMI sliding interfaces?
I tried it and by inspiring myself from the parallel snappyHexMesh tutorials... SnappyHexMesh runs without complaining but then the pimpleDyMFoam case doesn't run and complains about something that is obviously linked to a wrong mesh... Cheers, -Louis |
|
April 11, 2014, 14:17 |
|
#2 |
Member
Julian Langowski
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 91
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear Louis,
I don`t know the details of your case, but check out this thread: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...oundaries.html Best regards Julian
__________________
πάντα ῥεῖ - Heraclitus |
|
September 11, 2014, 13:35 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
|
Thanks Julian. I didn't solve the running snappyHexMesh in parallel problem (my case would run fine when on one processor), so I left it as is and moved one ;-)
-Louis |
|
September 12, 2014, 10:28 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Mehid
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Tehran-Iran
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0 |
Hey Louis,
I,m in the middle of a project and now just stopped at the point of your issue. the same as your mentioned case i use SHM & of course with some cyclicAMI boundary conditions, But when running simpleFoam(or any other solvers) it just crashes out with errors. really need your Tips if u managed how to get rid of that. regards, Metti. |
|
September 12, 2014, 10:32 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
|
Hello Mehid,
unfortunately I was never able to run snappyHexMesh in parallel. -Louis |
|
September 12, 2014, 11:10 |
|
#6 | |
New Member
Mehid
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Tehran-Iran
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0 |
Quote:
do you have problem in parallel running the SHM? |
||
September 12, 2014, 11:13 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
|
Yes, when I run SHM in parallel with my AMI case, the solver doesn't run anymore, gives errors. Now I don't remember the details because this is a long time ago. If I run SHM on one processor and then run the case in parallel it all works fine, although the scaling is really not good.
Cheers -Louis |
|
September 12, 2014, 11:22 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Mehid
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Tehran-Iran
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0 |
So Louis,
may I have the question of how do you make your cyclicAMI BCs? Do you use "createPatch" to change the type of the BCs to "cyclicAMI" ? |
|
September 15, 2014, 03:57 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
|
I use createPath in as sequence as this,
Code:
runApplication snappyHexMesh -overwrite runApplication renumberMesh -overwrite # force removal of fields generated by snappy \rm -rf 0 # - generate face/cell sets and zones # runApplication topoSet -dict system/createInletOutletSets.topoSetDict # - create the inlet/outlet and AMI patches runApplication createPatch -overwrite runApplication topoSet runApplication checkMesh Code:
{ name AMI1; patchInfo { type cyclicAMI; matchTolerance 0.0001; neighbourPatch AMI2; transform noOrdering; } constructFrom patches; patches (cropRotor); } |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh in parallel | shailesh.nitk | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 33 | January 25, 2022 11:35 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh in Parallel problem | swifty | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | November 6, 2015 05:40 |
simpleFoam parallel | AndrewMortimer | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | August 7, 2015 19:45 |
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing | sharonyue | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | June 10, 2013 10:34 |
SnappyHexMesh OF-1.6-ext crashes on a parallel run | norman1981 | OpenFOAM Bugs | 5 | December 7, 2011 13:48 |