CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Pre-Processing

thermophysicalProperties in simpleFOAM

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   December 17, 2013, 03:57
Default thermophysicalProperties in simpleFOAM
  #1
New Member
 
Marcus
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 13
marcus85 is on a distinguished road
Hello to all,

i want to set up an incompressible steady state study of an cooling water jacket.
No my Problem is how i should define the thermophysicalProperties, because almost all of the tutorials didn't include any thermophysicalProperties file and now i'm confused about this fact:
Do i need this file for my case?
If i don't need it: Where i've to define the constants of this file?
If i need: Which thermoType should i use?
(The file i attached is only from my setup for my rhoSimpleFoam cases:
/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |
| \\ / O peration | Version: 2.0.1 |
| \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.com |
| \\/ M anipulation | |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
location "constant";
object thermophysicalProperties;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

thermoType hPsiThermo<pureMixture<constTransport<specieThermo <hConstThermo<perfectGas>>>>>;

mixture
{
specie
{
nMoles 1;
molWeight 28.9;
}
thermodynamics
{
Cp 1000;
Hf 0;
}
transport
{
mu 1.8e-05;
Pr 0.7;
}
}


// ************************************************** *********************** //)
and another question for the setup is:
Should i define another model in the transportProperties file in my constant directory? Because i've seen, that there are other definitions in the tutorial Cases and there is the opportunity of two models i can use. Did somebody make experiences with this special models an how they work for validation?
Here is my file:
object transportProperties;
}
// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

transportModel Newtonian;

nu nu [ 0 2 -1 0 0 0 0 ] 4.74e-07;

Prt Prt [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 0.9;

Pr Pr [ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ] 3;

rho rho [ 1 -3 0 0 0 0 0 ] 983.19;

k k [ 1 1 -3 -1 0 0 0 ] 0.647;

Cp Cp [ 0 2 -2 -1 0 0 0 ] 4182;


// ************************************************** *********************** //
Thanks for all supply...

best regards

Marcus
marcus85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
incompressible flow, steady-state, thermophysicalproperties, transportproperties


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison DanM OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 January 31, 2020 16:26
simpleFoam parallel AndrewMortimer OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 12 August 7, 2015 19:45
Laminar simpleFoam and inviscid simpleFoam herenger OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 7 July 11, 2013 07:27
Trying to run a benchmark case with simpleFoam spsb OpenFOAM 3 February 24, 2012 10:07
Naca0012 k-e mpirun gives fpe whereas simpleFoam not Pierpaolo OpenFOAM 1 May 8, 2010 04:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:56.