|
[Sponsors] |
Forces (in controlDict) Giving Results 1/10 of Experimental Comparison |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 16, 2011, 23:30 |
Forces (in controlDict) Giving Results 1/10 of Experimental Comparison
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Daniel
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 156
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello all,
I am running a simulation on a NACA 0012 airfoil, and after confirming that my simulation yields very similar Cp plots to the experimental results, I am now trying to match Cl to the experimental data. The case in question is at 13 deg alpha, and while I should be getting a Cl of ~1.34, the forceCoeffs.dat file shows 0.134. The Cd is also coming out negative... The forces sub-dict of controlDict is as follows: Code:
forces { type forceCoeffs; functionObjectLibs ( "libforces.so" ); outputControl outputTime; outputInterval 500; patches (wing); pName p; UName U; rhoName rhoInf; log true; rhoInf 1.177; CofR ( 0.25 0 0 );//Center of rotation for moment calcs liftDir ( 0 1 0 ); dragDir ( 1 0 0 ); pitchAxis ( 0 0 1 ); magUInf 104.15; lRef 1; Aref 1; } Thanks, Dan |
|
October 23, 2011, 23:16 |
Follow-Up
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Daniel
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 156
Rep Power: 17 |
I will add some additional information:
Code:
Cd Cl Cm Results from OF: -0.0284 0.134 0.000628 Results from OF rotated to account for alpha: 0.00247 0.1369 0.000628 Results from manually integrating Cp with spreadsheet: 0.01280 1.167 -.00417 Results from Ref (NASA TM 4074 Table IV): 0.01994 1.3939 0.0226 The graph of the Cp results suggest that the data should be accurate. However, integrating the data yields low results for Cd and Cl, while Cm is way off the mark. Is it just a coincidence that the OF Cl data is 10% of the experimental value? Has anyone successfully integrated OF Cp results to yield Cl, Cd and/or Cm that are similar to experimental data? I would appreciate any assistance that is offered. Regards, Dan |
|
November 14, 2011, 08:03 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Felipe
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 16 |
The Aref is chordLength*width, so check that and run again your simulations, you may get better values after that.
Check also your Re number, it should be the same as in the transportProperties file. |
|
November 14, 2011, 20:11 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Daniel
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 156
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks, there was a problem with the setup that fixed Cl. Cd and Cm have a greater error margin, though.
Dan |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Comparing Experimental and Computational results. | New | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 27, 2007 13:08 |
NACA0012 experimental results. | Kyung-Seok, Kim | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 13, 2006 06:46 |
searching for experimental results | Vignesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 18, 2003 21:32 |
Need experimental results on turbulent flow | babyface | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 22, 2002 13:52 |
Valve Forces in CFdesign | Mike Clapp | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 8, 2001 15:09 |