|
[Sponsors] |
Mass conservation - buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 1, 2018, 20:55 |
Mass conservation - buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam
|
#1 |
New Member
Bruno Paes Fragoso
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8 |
Hi everyone! I'm trying to simulate the flow over tubes in a bank with heat transfer. I'm using the buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam solver for forced convection. I've set the g vector and beta to zero. My question is... Why the velocity is not according with the analytical solution (Vmax = 2 m/s) ? The tubes have transverse and longitudinal pitch equal 2 and diameter 1. The surface temperature is constant, 400K, and the internal field 300K. Inlet velocity 1 m/s and pressure zero gradient, outlet velocity zero gradient and pressure 0, top and bottom slip condition and frontAndBack empty (2D flow).
I think my mesh is OK. According to checkMesh Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 80996 internal points: 0 faces: 160002 internal faces: 78990 cells: 39832 faces per cell: 6 boundary patches: 5 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 1 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 39832 prisms: 0 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology frontAndBack 79664 80996 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet 148 298 ok (non-closed singly connected) topAndBottom 476 956 ok (non-closed singly connected) outlet 148 298 ok (non-closed singly connected) cylinderWalls 576 1152 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-11 -13 0) (45 13 1) Mesh has 2 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 0) Mesh has 2 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 0) All edges aligned with or perpendicular to non-empty directions. Boundary openness (-1.14969e-18 6.86221e-18 -2.93229e-20) OK. Max cell openness = 2.01764e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 2.31215 OK. Minimum face area = 0.0011945. Maximum face area = 0.2858. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 0.0011945. Max volume = 0.05716. Total volume = 1448.94. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 41.4806 average: 8.0013 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 0.661525 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. End The max velocity is calculated by Vmax = (((Transversal pitch/(Transversal pitch - diameter)) * inlet velocity). Somebody have experienced that problem or something familiar? Any suggestion? Thank you for your help!! |
|
October 5, 2018, 10:01 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
Why would you expect the 2 m/s? It looks like this should only be the case if you have these tubes locked inside a channel? Now you allow the fluid to also flow above or below it. As that area will have lower resistance, more fluid will pass than through the tubes. Regards, Tom |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass conservation problem with VOF model | pat77 | FLUENT | 6 | February 24, 2017 04:39 |
Can FVM have mass sinks/ mass conservation problems? | whuup | FLUENT | 0 | March 8, 2014 18:48 |
mass conservation in VOF method | meith | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 12, 2010 11:30 |
lost of mass conservation | jjchristophe | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2010 05:44 |
Mass Conservation in LES | Jaswant | Main CFD Forum | 8 | July 4, 2005 22:32 |