CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Post-Processing

Mass conservation - buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 1, 2018, 20:55
Exclamation Mass conservation - buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam
  #1
New Member
 
Bruno Paes Fragoso
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 8
brunop96 is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone! I'm trying to simulate the flow over tubes in a bank with heat transfer. I'm using the buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam solver for forced convection. I've set the g vector and beta to zero. My question is... Why the velocity is not according with the analytical solution (Vmax = 2 m/s) ? The tubes have transverse and longitudinal pitch equal 2 and diameter 1. The surface temperature is constant, 400K, and the internal field 300K. Inlet velocity 1 m/s and pressure zero gradient, outlet velocity zero gradient and pressure 0, top and bottom slip condition and frontAndBack empty (2D flow).



I think my mesh is OK. According to checkMesh


Create time

Create polyMesh for time = 0

Time = 0

Mesh stats
points: 80996
internal points: 0
faces: 160002
internal faces: 78990
cells: 39832
faces per cell: 6
boundary patches: 5
point zones: 0
face zones: 0
cell zones: 1

Overall number of cells of each type:
hexahedra: 39832
prisms: 0
wedges: 0
pyramids: 0
tet wedges: 0
tetrahedra: 0
polyhedra: 0

Checking topology...
Boundary definition OK.
Cell to face addressing OK.
Point usage OK.
Upper triangular ordering OK.
Face vertices OK.
Number of regions: 1 (OK).

Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces...
Patch Faces Points Surface topology
frontAndBack 79664 80996 ok (non-closed singly connected)
inlet 148 298 ok (non-closed singly connected)
topAndBottom 476 956 ok (non-closed singly connected)
outlet 148 298 ok (non-closed singly connected)
cylinderWalls 576 1152 ok (non-closed singly connected)

Checking geometry...
Overall domain bounding box (-11 -13 0) (45 13 1)
Mesh has 2 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 0)
Mesh has 2 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 0)
All edges aligned with or perpendicular to non-empty directions.
Boundary openness (-1.14969e-18 6.86221e-18 -2.93229e-20) OK.
Max cell openness = 2.01764e-16 OK.
Max aspect ratio = 2.31215 OK.
Minimum face area = 0.0011945. Maximum face area = 0.2858. Face area magnitudes OK.
Min volume = 0.0011945. Max volume = 0.05716. Total volume = 1448.94. Cell volumes OK.
Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 41.4806 average: 8.0013
Non-orthogonality check OK.
Face pyramids OK.
Max skewness = 0.661525 OK.
Coupled point location match (average 0) OK.

Mesh OK.

End



The max velocity is calculated by Vmax = (((Transversal pitch/(Transversal pitch - diameter)) * inlet velocity).

Somebody have experienced that problem or something familiar? Any suggestion?



Thank you for your help!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Captura de tela de 2018-10-01 21-39-15.jpg (192.8 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg Captura de tela de 2018-10-01 21-38-43.jpg (88.0 KB, 13 views)
brunop96 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 5, 2018, 10:01
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Tom Fahner
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Breda, Netherlands
Posts: 646
Rep Power: 32
tomf will become famous soon enoughtomf will become famous soon enough
Send a message via MSN to tomf Send a message via Skype™ to tomf
Hi,

Why would you expect the 2 m/s? It looks like this should only be the case if you have these tubes locked inside a channel? Now you allow the fluid to also flow above or below it. As that area will have lower resistance, more fluid will pass than through the tubes.

Regards,
Tom
tomf is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass conservation problem with VOF model pat77 FLUENT 6 February 24, 2017 04:39
Can FVM have mass sinks/ mass conservation problems? whuup FLUENT 0 March 8, 2014 18:48
mass conservation in VOF method meith Main CFD Forum 2 August 12, 2010 11:30
lost of mass conservation jjchristophe FLUENT 0 June 18, 2010 05:44
Mass Conservation in LES Jaswant Main CFD Forum 8 July 4, 2005 22:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:28.