|
[Sponsors] |
April 6, 2016, 04:30 |
wallHeatFlux in a transient case
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Laurent DASTUGUE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chartres, France
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi,
i am currently using wallHeatFlux to have the value of the heat flux at each time, for a transient case. I remark that the values written on wallHeatFlux files are totally wrong. It seems that for a transient case, the commant wallHeatFlux computes the cumulated wallHeatFlux since the beginning of the job while i want the value at each time. Does anyone know something about it ? Thank you very much. Have a good day. Laurent |
|
April 16, 2016, 15:12 |
|
#2 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Greetings Laurent,
There is nothing in the source code that would suggest that this should occur. Are you able to reproduce the same error with one of OpenFOAM's tutorials? Beyond this, I'll need more details in order to try and reproduce this error you're witnessing:
Bruno
__________________
|
|
April 19, 2016, 06:57 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Laurent DASTUGUE
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chartres, France
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello Bruno,
i haven't succeed to reproduce this error. Sorry for the time you have spent to answer to me. It seems that the physical conditions on my test-case were wrong. I'm really sorry. Have a good day. Laurent |
|
Tags |
cumulated, transient, wallheatflux |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MRFSimpleFoam wind turbine case continuity error | ysh1227 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | August 16, 2016 10:25 |
MRFSimpleFoam wind turbine case diverges | ysh1227 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | May 7, 2015 11:13 |
Transient case in solar load model | itsme_kit | FLUENT | 2 | February 16, 2014 12:22 |
Transient case with no inlet region | Ancient_Nik | CFX | 11 | March 21, 2011 02:46 |
Transient case running with a super computer | microfin | FLUENT | 0 | March 31, 2009 12:20 |