|
[Sponsors] |
June 12, 2013, 11:09 |
a reconstructPar issue
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
although I have set
Code:
writeInterval .000001; Code:
Time = 7.29471e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.35352e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.41106e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.46859e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.52612e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.5811e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.63607e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.69105e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.74602e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.801e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.85597e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.91095e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 7.96592e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 8.0209e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 8.07587e-07 Reconstructing FV fields Reconstructing volScalarFields total(p) Reconstructing point fields No point fields No lagrangian fields Time = 8.13085e-07
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
June 15, 2013, 18:26 |
|
#2 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Note for future readers: this was due to this function object:
Code:
totalP // user-defined name of function object entry { type pressureTools; libs ("libutilityFunctionObjects.so"); //region defaultRegion; enabled yes; //timeStart 0; //timeEnd 10; outputControl timeStep;//outputTime;// outputInterval 1; // 5000; calcTotal yes; calcCoeff no; pRef 0; } Code:
outputControl timeStep; outputInterval 1; For more information on this topic, check: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...tml#post434184 - post #14
__________________
|
|
June 16, 2013, 06:17 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
Bruno at last I changed to SWAK again.but if I want to use function objects how should manage the 3 dictionaries?(I want it writes on a patch in all time steps but not in new folders and for all times,how should set the functions settings?)
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
June 16, 2013, 09:52 |
|
#4 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Hi Ehsan,
Sorry, I'm a bit slow today... could you give a more explicit example? Best regards, Bruno
__________________
|
|
June 16, 2013, 10:11 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
Hi Bruno
I only wanted to use function objects without those excess folders like Swak4Foam.I think it isn't possible for current function objects settings as you said,right?
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
June 16, 2013, 10:14 |
|
#6 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Didn't I explain how it could be used in this post: http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ope...tml#post434184 - post #14?
__________________
|
|
June 16, 2013, 10:35 |
|
#7 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
it still writes folders only containing total(p).
maybe it can't be resolved. anyway Im using swak instead. thanks so much dear Bruno.
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
June 16, 2013, 12:22 |
|
#8 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
As I said twice before: this requires to modify the source code of the function object "pressureTools".
__________________
|
|
June 16, 2013, 12:25 |
|
#9 |
Senior Member
Ehsan
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Iran
Posts: 2,208
Rep Power: 27 |
thaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanks
__________________
Injustice Anywhere is a Threat for Justice Everywhere.Martin Luther King. To Be or Not To Be,Thats the Question! The Only Stupid Question Is the One that Goes Unasked. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CyclicAMI Issue In OpenFOAM 2.2.0 | prasant | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 17 | March 16, 2013 03:00 |
reconstructPar and a high number of snapshots | fs82 | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | April 18, 2012 05:37 |
Meshing related issue in Flow EFD | appu | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 1 | May 22, 2011 09:27 |
Problem with reconstructPar | Jochem | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 3 | March 24, 2011 13:44 |
Problem with reconstructPar | fabianpk | OpenFOAM | 5 | August 14, 2007 10:17 |