|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Difference in number of cells between Paraview and Log files |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 9, 2012, 07:21 |
Difference in number of cells between Paraview and Log files
|
#1 |
New Member
Unnikrishnan Mohankumar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 15 |
Dear Foamers,
I have small problem with the number of cells in the log file and the Object Inspector in Paraview In Log.File for SnappyHexMesh Layer mesh : cells : 2,484,394 Object Inspector - Paraview Number of Cells : 7,463,450 I assume that the Log file for SnappyHexMesh is correct.. but why is there a difference in cells in Paraview Thanks Unnikrishnan |
|
January 10, 2012, 05:11 |
|
#2 |
Member
Norman Del Puppo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hinwil, CH
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Unnikrishnan,
check if you have enabled the "Decompose polyhedra" checkbox in the Object Inspector panel (see the Properties tab). Regards Norman |
|
January 10, 2012, 07:45 |
Difference in number of cells between Paraview and Log files
|
#3 |
New Member
Unnikrishnan Mohankumar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks Norman,
But i am using Paraview 3.6.1. and my paraview doesn't show an option to enable "Decompose polyhedra" checkbox in the Object Inspector panel (Properties tab). what version are you using. Does it have something to do with DecomposePolyhedra OpenFOAMReader for Paraview. Thanks Unnikrishnan |
|
January 10, 2012, 07:53 |
|
#4 |
Member
Norman Del Puppo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hinwil, CH
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
Yeah you're right, I might be wrong but this checkbox was included starting from Paraview 3.10. I am using Paraview 3.12.0-RC2. Download an up to date paraview version, then create an empty file (.foam extension) in your case directory (in example: touch case.foam). Run paraview and load that file, it should work fine :-)
Regards Norman |
|
January 10, 2012, 08:38 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Unnikrishnan Mohankumar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 15 |
Thanks Norman,
Thanks for the reply. I am still using paraview 3.6.1... I will be asking my university staff to update the Paraview to 3.12. I was not able to update it on my own as regular user ( not Root User ). I tried it with Cmake from Paraview build and install.. But it dint work... http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView:Build_And_Install#Build_Your_Own_CMake If you have some link for Regular user.. do share it... Thanks & Regards Unnikrishnan |
|
January 10, 2012, 08:46 |
|
#6 |
Member
Norman Del Puppo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hinwil, CH
Posts: 57
Rep Power: 17 |
Well, why don't you try a pre-compiled version? You can download the one you need here: http://www.paraview.org/paraview/res.../software.html .
Then unpack the package in your home. Run the package paraview executable. In this way you won't need your system admin anymore :-) Norman |
|
January 10, 2012, 10:52 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Unnikrishnan Mohankumar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 29
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Norman,
I have installed paraview 3.12 with the help of my Lab IT-Incharge... With the Paraview3.12 the problem seems to be solved. Now it display the correct results. Thanks for the help... Thanks & Regards Unnikrishnan. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Keeping intermediate files | OVS | SU2 | 5 | December 5, 2021 12:41 |
Difference between forceCoeffs function and Paraview force calculation | alexey_sw | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 2 | June 9, 2021 05:05 |
AMI speed performance | danny123 | OpenFOAM | 21 | October 24, 2020 05:13 |
Shape optimization doesn't converge - Adjoint log file | JPBLourenco | SU2 Shape Design | 0 | December 11, 2017 09:41 |
[OpenFOAM] ParaView shows bad cells, checkMesh doesn't seem to notice. | CoolHand | ParaView | 2 | August 21, 2014 16:58 |