|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Is it possible to use snappyHexMesh basing on a tetrahedral background mesh? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 28, 2011, 13:43 |
Is it possible to use snappyHexMesh basing on a tetrahedral background mesh?
|
#1 |
New Member
Alexey Kochevsky
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 16 |
Dear OpenFOAMers,
according to everything what I have read, snappyHexMesh is used basing on a background hex mesh, typically generated with blockMesh. In many cases, however, it would be convenient to generate an unstructured tetra mesh at first, using SALOME for example, and then use snappyHexMesh (and snapEdge) to get fine boundary layer cells. Is it possible to use snappyHexMesh basing on a tetrahedral background mesh? If no, would it be difficult to upgrade it somehow to make it possible? Best regards, Alexey Kochevsky |
|
Tags |
snappyhexmesh, tetra mesh |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
[OpenFOAM] snappyHexMesh - can't open mesh in ParaView | tfigueiro | ParaView | 0 | June 11, 2015 20:05 |
[Gmsh] background mesh in gmsh | Nick_J | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | March 20, 2013 05:20 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh and location in background mesh | erik023 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | March 22, 2009 10:16 |