|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh - Refinement Level |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 3, 2010, 17:27 |
snappyHexMesh - Refinement Level
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Andrea Pasquali
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello,
I'm using OF 1.6.x. I would like to obtain a car into tunnel mesh with 3 different refinement boxes (refinement mode inside). See the attached picture. First, I tried: level 1 for "refinementBox_1", level 2 for "refinementBox_2", level 3 for "refinementBox_3", level min 4 max 5 for car surface. I obtain the mesh but, for my case, it's not very thick. Second, I tried: level 3 for "refinementBox_1", level 4 for "refinementBox_2", level 5 for "refinementBox_3", level min 6 max 7 for car surface. I obtain the mesh but I lost the refinement boxes! I have a thick mesh only around the car surface, but not into the 3 refinement boxes! So, what am I wronging? Is there a bug in 1.6.x? Is there a maximum global level for refine mesh? Can it depend from the cells dimension in blockMesh? How can I obtain my desired mesh? Thanks for any reply Andrea
__________________
Andrea Pasquali |
|
February 4, 2010, 07:56 |
|
#2 |
Member
Wolfram Kretzschmar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Andrea,
I'm not an expert at all, but t first reading, this comes to my mind: Code:
object snappyHexMeshDict; .... // Geometry. Definition of all surfaces. All surfaces are of class // searchableSurface. // Surfaces are used // - to specify refinement for any mesh cell intersecting it // - to specify refinement for any mesh cell inside/outside/near // - to 'snap' the mesh boundary to the surface geometry { bla { type triSurfaceMesh; name blabla; } refinementBox { type searchableBox; min ( 0.0 0.0 0.0); max ( 1.0 1.0 1.0); } }; // Settings for the castellatedMesh generation. castellatedMeshControls { // Surface based refinement // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Specifies two levels for every surface. The first is the minimum level, // every cell intersecting a surface gets refined up to the minimum level. // The second level is the maximum level. Cells that 'see' multiple // intersections where the intersections make an // angle > resolveFeatureAngle get refined up to the maximum level. refinementSurfaces { blabla { // Surface-wise min and max refinement level level (4 5); } } // Region-wise refinement // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Specifies refinement level for cells in relation to a surface. One of // three modes // - distance. 'levels' specifies per distance to the surface the // wanted refinement level. The distances need to be specified in // descending order. // - inside. 'levels' is only one entry and only the level is used. All // cells inside the surface get refined up to the level. The surface // needs to be closed for this to be possible. // - outside. Same but cells outside. refinementRegions { refinementBox { mode inside; levels ((1E15 4)); } } If I were you, I would set up the surrounding mesh using blockMesh manually and then using snappy to add your special geometry. Cheers Wolle
__________________
CAELinux 2010 -- OpenFOAM 1.7 |
|
February 4, 2010, 09:21 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Andrea Pasquali
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Wolle,
thank you very much for you reply! I have a car surface in .stl file (average tria dimension 6 mm). The tunnel is in X 55 m, in Y 13 m, in Z 10 m. My car is in X 4.8 m, in Y 2 m, in Z 1.5 m. The cell dimension of blockMesh is 350 mm. So: refinementBox1 -> level 1 -> 1/2 -> cell dimension = 175 mm refinementBox2 -> level 2 -> 1/4 -> cell dimension = 87.5 mm refinementBox3 -> level 3 -> 1/8 -> cell dimension = 43.75 mm refinementSurfaces level (4 5) This mesh is whit 3 boxes but is not thick. If I try with refinementBox1 -> level 2 refinementBox2 -> level 3 refinementBox3 -> level 4 refinementSurfaces level (5 6) I lost my 3 boxes!!! Why? Do you think I have to refine my blockMesh? Thanks
__________________
Andrea Pasquali |
|
February 4, 2010, 11:43 |
|
#4 |
Member
Wolfram Kretzschmar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 71
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Andrea,
I have to repeat, that I'm not experienced at all! I just think, that the refinement areas and levels refer to the STL surface and intersections with it. As your boxes are far from the STL surface, they wont be refined. You give the level, alright, but for snappy there's no reason to refine as there's no related surface. That's how I understood snappy. However I'm curious why the first attempt seems to work. On the other hand I remember somebody mentioning wake areas to be refined with refinement boxes (which would be an antithesis to what I wrote). Anyway: To me it would be an easy workaround (or maybe just to give it a try), to mesh your boxes manually with blockMesh, i.e. meshing the boxes as described in the damBreak tutorial, each of them with a different grading. Cheers Wolle P.S.: If you like... give your first version a try with refinementSurfaces level (5 6) and your second version a try with refinementSurfaces level (5 5), leaving the other settings as they are. I'm just curious what would happen...
__________________
CAELinux 2010 -- OpenFOAM 1.7 |
|
February 7, 2010, 06:28 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Francesco Del Citto
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Zürich Area, Switzerland
Posts: 237
Rep Power: 18 |
Hi Andrea,
what you describe in your first email is really strange... It would be useful if you could post here your snappyHexMeshDict and maybe try with a more recent 1.6.x version. Francesco |
|
February 8, 2010, 04:08 |
|
#6 | |
Senior Member
Andrea Pasquali
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 142
Rep Power: 17 |
Hello everybody,
I tried the first Wolle's advice: level 1,2,3 for the boxes and level (5 6) for the car surface: I got 3 boxes! Now I would like to increase the refinement level. Before this test I tried whit OF 1.6 but whit same result... This is my snappy dictionary: Quote:
Thanks Andrea
__________________
Andrea Pasquali |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh running killed! | Mark JIN | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 7 | June 14, 2022 02:37 |
[snappyHexMesh] Edge Refinement | fracasce | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | December 2, 2017 14:30 |
[snappyHexMesh] Adding layers goes wrong with SnappyHexMesh | Elise | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 1 | April 22, 2013 03:32 |
killed "snappyHexMesh" | parkh32 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 2 | April 8, 2012 18:12 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh aborting | Tobi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | November 10, 2010 04:23 |