CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion

[snappyHexMesh] external flow with snappyHexMesh

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 8, 2010, 05:48
Default external flow with snappyHexMesh
  #1
Member
 
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16
chelvistero is on a distinguished road
Hello,
the case i wanted to create is an external flow over a cylinder. I have created the cylinder in catia and imported it in openfoam as a stl file. Then i create a mesh around the cylinder using blockmesh. Now i want to mesh again with the cylinder using snappyHexMesh. These are my first steps using snappy so I don't find the bug in the code!
It was my idea to remesh the mesh of blockMesh getting a finer mesh near the cylinder.
I hope anyone can help
P.s.: sorry for the bad english




/*--------------------------------*- C++ -*----------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |
| \\ / O peration | Version: 1.5 |
| \\ / A nd | Web: http://www.OpenFOAM.org |
| \\/ M anipulation | |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
FoamFile
{
version 2.0;
format ascii;
class dictionary;
object autoHexMeshDict;
}

// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //

// Which of the steps to run
castellatedMesh true;
snap true;
addLayers false;

geometry
{
Zyl1.stl
{
type triSurfaceMesh;
regions
{
CATIASTL
{
name Zylinder;
}
}
}


}


castellatedMeshControls
{

locationInMesh (0 0 0); //it is a point outside the stl and inside the blockmesh mesh

maxLocalCells 4000000;

maxGlobalCells 12000000;

minRefinementCells 10;

nCellsBetweenLevels 2;

resolveFeatureAngle 70;


features
(

);

refinementSurfaces
{
Zyl1.stl
{
level (2 2);
regions
{
CATIASTL
{
level (3 3);
}
}
}
}


refinementRegions
{
}

}
snapControls
{
nSmoothPatch 3;
tolerance 4.0;
nSolveIter 30;
nRelaxIter 6;
}

meshQualityControls
{

maxNonOrtho 65;
maxBoundarySkewness 20;
maxInternalSkewness 4;
maxConcave 80;
minFlatness 0.5;
minVol 1e-13;
minArea -1;
minTwist 0.05;
minDeterminant 0.001;
minFaceWeight 0.05;
minVolRatio 0.01;
minTriangleTwist 1;
nSmoothScale 4;
errorReduction 0.75;

}

addLayersControls
{
}
mergeTolerance 1E-6;
debug 0;

// ************************************************** *********************** //
chelvistero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 11:01
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
BastiL
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 20
bastil is on a distinguished road
First look that looks fine. What is your problem? What error do you get?

Regards.
bastil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 13:40
Default
  #3
Member
 
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16
chelvistero is on a distinguished road
Hello,
i get no error but in paraview there isn't shown a new mesh. there is only shown the mesh generated in blockMesh. I think that there must be the mesh around the cylinder.
chelvistero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 8, 2010, 16:21
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
BastiL
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 530
Rep Power: 20
bastil is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by chelvistero View Post
Hello,
i get no error but in paraview there isn't shown a new mesh. there is only shown the mesh generated in blockMesh. I think that there must be the mesh around the cylinder.
I guess that is ok. Does the output look reasonable?
Do you get a "1" and "2" folder? This should contain your meshes after refinement (1) and snapping (2). If you ran in parallel the might be hidden in the processorX directories.
To see the mesh in paraview you have to use the animation control to jump to the next "time".
bastil is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2010, 03:52
Default
  #5
Member
 
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16
chelvistero is on a distinguished road
Yes the folders 1 and 2 were created executing snappy but the variables p and U aren't there. I do not run in parallel
(I think) but in the new folders there are the polyMesh folders created. However nothing happens when i jump to the next time in paraview (i think there must be snapped out the geometry of the cylinder).
Here is the code executing snappy

Thank you for your replies!!

/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*\
| ========= | |
| \\ / F ield | OpenFOAM: The Open Source CFD Toolbox |
| \\ / O peration | Version: 1.6 |
| \\ / A nd | Web: www.OpenFOAM.org |
| \\/ M anipulation | |
\*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
Build : 1.6-53b7f692aa41
Exec : snappyHexMesh
Date : Jan 09 2010
Time : 08:35:53
Host : axel-laptop
PID : 2546
Case : /home/axel/OpenFOAM/axel-1.6/run/run/incomressible/Zylinder
nProcs : 1
SigFpe : Enabling floating point exception trapping (FOAM_SIGFPE).

// * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
Create time

Create mesh for time = 0

Read mesh in = 0.06 s

Overall mesh bounding box : (0 -0.1 -0.05) (0.05 0.1 0.05)
Relative tolerance : 1e-06
Absolute matching distance : 2.29129e-07

Reading refinement surfaces.
Read refinement surfaces in = 0 s

Reading refinement shells.
Read refinement shells in = 0 s

Setting refinement level of surface to be consistent with shells.
Checked shell refinement in = 0 s


Determining initial surface intersections
-----------------------------------------

Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 3300
Number of intersected edges : 0
Calculated surface intersections in = 0.04 s

Initial mesh : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000

Adding patches for surface regions
----------------------------------

Patch Region
----- ------
zylinder:

5 zylinder_CATIASTL

Added patches in = 0 s

Selecting decompositionMethod hierarchical

Refinement phase
----------------

Found point (0 0 0) in cell 550 on processor 0
Reading external feature lines.
Read feature lines in = 0.01 s


Surface refinement iteration 0
------------------------------

Marked for refinement due to surface intersection : 0 cells.
Marked for refinement due to curvature/regions : 0 cells.
Determined cells to refine in = 0.01 s
Selected for refinement : 0 cells (out of 1000)
Stopping refining since too few cells selected.


Removing mesh beyond surface intersections
------------------------------------------

Found point (0 0 0) in cell 550 in global region 0 out of 1 regions.
Keeping all cells in region 0 containing point (0 0 0)
Selected for keeping : 1000 cells.
Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0

Shell refinement iteration 0
----------------------------

Marked for refinement due to refinement shells : 0 cells.
Determined cells to refine in = 0.03 s
Selected for internal refinement : 0 cells (out of 1000)
Stopping refining since too few cells selected.


Splitting mesh at surface intersections
---------------------------------------

Introducing baffles for 0 faces that are intersected by the surface.

Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0
Created baffles in = 0.02 s


After introducing baffles : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000

Introducing baffles to block off problem cells
----------------------------------------------

markFacesOnProblemCells : marked 0 additional internal faces to be converted into baffles.
Analyzed problem cells in = 0.01 s


Introducing baffles to delete problem cells.

Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0
Created baffles in = 0.02 s


After introducing baffles : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000

Remove unreachable sections of mesh
-----------------------------------

Keeping all cells in region 0 containing point (0 0 0)
Selected for keeping : 1000 cells.
Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0
Split mesh in = 0.03 s


After subsetting : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000

Handling cells with snap problems
---------------------------------

Introducing baffles for 0 faces that are intersected by the surface.

Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0
Created baffles in = 0.02 s


After introducing baffles : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000

Introducing baffles to block off problem cells
----------------------------------------------

markFacesOnProblemCells : marked 0 additional internal faces to be converted into baffles.
Analyzed problem cells in = 0.01 s


Introducing baffles to delete problem cells.

Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0
Created baffles in = 0.02 s


After introducing baffles : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000

Remove unreachable sections of mesh
-----------------------------------

Keeping all cells in region 0 containing point (0 0 0)
Selected for keeping : 1000 cells.
Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0
Split mesh in = 0.02 s


After subsetting : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000
dupNonManifoldPoints : Found : 0 non-manifold points (out of 1331)
Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 0
Number of intersected edges : 0
getDuplicateFaces : found 0 pairs of duplicate faces.

Detected unsplittable baffles : 0

Merge refined boundary faces
----------------------------

mergePatchFaces : Merging 0 sets of faces.
Removing 0 straight edge points.
Refined mesh : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000
Writing mesh to time 0.005
Written mesh in = 0.08 s.

Morphing phase
--------------

Constructing mesh displacer ...
Using mesh parameters
{
maxNonOrtho 65;
maxBoundarySkewness 20;
maxInternalSkewness 4;
maxConcave 80;
minFlatness 0.5;
minVol 1e-13;
minArea -1;
minTwist 0.05;
minDeterminant 0.001;
minFaceWeight 0.05;
minVolRatio 0.01;
minTriangleTwist 1;
nSmoothScale 4;
errorReduction 0.75;
}


Checking initial mesh ...
Checking faces in error :
non-orthogonality > 65 degrees : 0
faces with face pyramid volume < 1e-13 : 0
faces with concavity > 80 degrees : 0
faces with skewness > 4 (internal) or 20 (boundary) : 0
faces with interpolation weights (0..1) < 0.05 : 0
faces with volume ratio of neighbour cells < 0.01 : 0
faces with face twist < 0.05 : 0
faces with triangle twist < 1 : 0
faces on cells with determinant < 0.001 : 0
Detected 0 illegal faces (concave, zero area or negative cell pyramid volume)
Checked initial mesh in = 0.01 s


Smoothing patch points ...
Smoothing iteration 0
Found 0 non-mainfold point(s).

Scaling iteration 0
Moving mesh using diplacement scaling : min:1 max:1
Checking faces in error :
non-orthogonality > 65 degrees : 0
faces with face pyramid volume < 1e-13 : 0
faces with concavity > 80 degrees : 0
faces with skewness > 4 (internal) or 20 (boundary) : 0
faces with interpolation weights (0..1) < 0.05 : 0
faces with volume ratio of neighbour cells < 0.01 : 0
faces with face twist < 0.05 : 0
faces with triangle twist < 1 : 0
faces on cells with determinant < 0.001 : 0
Successfully moved mesh

Smoothing iteration 1
Found 0 non-mainfold point(s).

Scaling iteration 0
Moving mesh using diplacement scaling : min:1 max:1
Checking faces in error :
non-orthogonality > 65 degrees : 0
faces with face pyramid volume < 1e-13 : 0
faces with concavity > 80 degrees : 0
faces with skewness > 4 (internal) or 20 (boundary) : 0
faces with interpolation weights (0..1) < 0.05 : 0
faces with volume ratio of neighbour cells < 0.01 : 0
faces with face twist < 0.05 : 0
faces with triangle twist < 1 : 0
faces on cells with determinant < 0.001 : 0
Successfully moved mesh

Smoothing iteration 2
Found 0 non-mainfold point(s).

Scaling iteration 0
Moving mesh using diplacement scaling : min:1 max:1
Checking faces in error :
non-orthogonality > 65 degrees : 0
faces with face pyramid volume < 1e-13 : 0
faces with concavity > 80 degrees : 0
faces with skewness > 4 (internal) or 20 (boundary) : 0
faces with interpolation weights (0..1) < 0.05 : 0
faces with volume ratio of neighbour cells < 0.01 : 0
faces with face twist < 0.05 : 0
faces with triangle twist < 1 : 0
faces on cells with determinant < 0.001 : 0
Successfully moved mesh

Patch points smoothed in = 0.06 s


Calculating patchDisplacement as distance to nearest surface point ...
Calculated surface displacement in = 0 s


Smoothing displacement ...
Iteration 0
Iteration 10
Iteration 20
Displacement smoothed in = 0 s


Moving mesh ...

Iteration 0
Moving mesh using diplacement scaling : min:1 max:1
Checking faces in error :
non-orthogonality > 65 degrees : 0
faces with face pyramid volume < 1e-13 : 0
faces with concavity > 80 degrees : 0
faces with skewness > 4 (internal) or 20 (boundary) : 0
faces with interpolation weights (0..1) < 0.05 : 0
faces with volume ratio of neighbour cells < 0.01 : 0
faces with face twist < 0.05 : 0
faces with triangle twist < 1 : 0
faces on cells with determinant < 0.001 : 0
Successfully moved mesh
Moved mesh in = 0.02 s


Repatching faces according to nearest surface ...
Repatched 0 faces in = 0 s


Edge intersection testing:
Number of edges : 3300
Number of edges to retest : 1956
Number of intersected edges : 0
Snapped mesh : cells:1000 faces:3300 points:1331
Cells per refinement level:
0 1000
Writing mesh to time 0.01
Written mesh in = 0.04 s.
Finished meshing in = 0.51 s.
End
chelvistero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 9, 2010, 13:59
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Axel Tietjen
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 17
Axel_T is on a distinguished road
Hi Axel,

I think, there possibly went something wrong with the naming of your geometry, surface and regions.

It seems to me that your geometry subdictionary should look somehow like this:

geometry
{
Zyl1.stl
{
type triSurfaceMesh;
name Zylinder;
}
}

The name Zylinder is then used to define the other options. If you want to refine the internal mesh, too, you should define a region within the above geometry subdictionary. That could look like this:
refinementBox // name it as you want
{
type searchableBox;
min (-0.02 -0.02 -0.0); // location in x/y/z of one edge
max ( 0.02 0.02 0.03); // location in x/y/z of the opposite edge
}
If you want the whole mesh to be refined, those coordinates would most easily be the coordinates of YOUR blockMesh points. But in my opinion it is better to set blockMesh to produce smaller cells, in this case. But you can use the refinementBox (or several boxes) to refine special areas of interest.

To specify the refinement at the geometry surface, the refinementSurface subdictionary should better look like this, I'd suggest:

refinementSurfaces
{
Zylinder
{
level (2 2);
}
}

There you can simply use the geometry-name instead of the stl-file-name.

Just to keep the structure of snappyHexMeshDict tidy, I would put the <resolveFeatureAngle 70;>-entry directly behind the refinementSurfaces subdictionary, because it belongs to the second entry within the level-brace. So <level (2 3)> and <resolveFeatureAngle 70> would mean, that snappy refines each cell, that intersect the surface two time, but even three times, where the geometry is maybe a edge. But for a zylinder that option wouldn't make sense, of course.

I see that your refinementRegion is empty. But if you wish to use that, just type:
refinementRegions
{
refinementBox
{
mode inside;
levels ((1e15 2));
}
}
The first value within the brace 1e15 has no meaning.

If you want to try these suggested changes, you can run checkMesh after snappy is done and post it's output here.

Good luck

Axel
Axel_T is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 02:53
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Claus Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 18
idrama is on a distinguished road
Hey folks!

As I have seen you guys are very involved into snappyHexMesh. I want to ask you is it possible to use snappyHexMesh also for internal flows. I mean if I have pipe in stl then can I created a mesh in the inner of the pipe.

cheers,

Claus
idrama is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 04:36
Default
  #8
Member
 
Axel Söhngen
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany, Trier
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 16
chelvistero is on a distinguished road
Thank you Axel, i have changed my snappy Dict. and it works.
But now when I type in "icoFoam" there is missing the file p! In controlDict I have started with "latest time". Do I have to copy file p and U into directory 2?
chelvistero is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 11, 2010, 19:23
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Axel Tietjen
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 17
Axel_T is on a distinguished road
Hello Claus,

it is no problem to create a internal mesh with snappy. In fact, I've never done something else...
The trick is just to set the
locationInMesh (x y z);
to a coordinate, that is within your stl-surface. That's all!



@ Axel:
Great! I'm glad, that I was able to help you with that hints.

To your new question: yes, it would help. But make shure, that you copy all needed files to your start-time-directory. I'm not so familiar with icoFoam since I use the compressible solver rhoPisoFoam, which needs p,U,T,k,omega,mut,alphat, ...
Maybe a look in the userguide's tutorial on icoFoam (chapter 2, I think) would give you more details.

bye
Axel_T is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 12, 2010, 06:53
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Claus Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 18
idrama is on a distinguished road
Hallo Alex,

I have to tell you that I have even never used snappy because I did not know that this tool is even appropriated for my kind of problem. However, before is started to invest time in it, could you please send me a simple case form which I can learn? I just need to see it then I know what to do.

Thanks in advance!

Claus
idrama is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 12, 2010, 09:26
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Claus Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wiesbaden, Germany
Posts: 241
Rep Power: 18
idrama is on a distinguished road
Hallo Alex,

is me again. I have investigate the snappy hex mesh all the morning. As I can see, all what I want to please you is could you send me or post such a snappyHexDict file with in inter flow application. That would be grateful.

Cheers,

Claus
idrama is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 15, 2010, 20:43
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Axel Tietjen
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 17
Axel_T is on a distinguished road
Hi Claus,

sorry for my late reply, I'm quite busy at the moment.

Here is a sHMDict that worked for me. It is just a modified file from a tutorial.
(I had to rename it as a .txt file, to upload it.)

Please notice that I use a very small geometry in my cases, so locationInMesh and the coordinates of the refinement Boxes are small values and not many refinement levels. You may fit it for your kind of application.

in my opinion the "minVol" parameter at the bottom of the file has to fit to the smallest regular cell-size. So you have to calculate: With a initial (block-)Mesh of 2x2x2mm blocks, the cell volume reduces to 1/8 within each refinementLevel. While level 0 has a Volume of 8e-9m³, a regular level-3-cell has only 1.56e-11m³. Since some cells get cut to half at the surface and then get deformed to snap onto it, I set the "minVol"-parameter to 1/8th of that: 1e-12 in that case.

I don't know exactly what snappy does in every step, but playing around I came to those experiences.

Tip: Just create a simple stl-geometry like a sphere to learn using snappy.
Attached Files
File Type: txt snappyHexMeshDict.txt (9.1 KB, 140 views)
Axel_T is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Issues on the simulation of high-speed compressible flow within turbomachinery dowlee OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 11 August 6, 2021 07:40
About the Reynolds Number and Y-plus in external flow Mason liu CFX 18 November 10, 2014 19:37
[snappyHexMesh] Pipe flow / Internal fluid dynamics with SnappyHexMesh denner OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 3 October 13, 2011 10:24
Modeling internal and external flow for a nozzle smschnob Main CFD Forum 1 November 11, 2010 18:12
Best settings for solar car external flow problems kdrbrk Main CFD Forum 0 July 16, 2010 03:18


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11.