|
[Sponsors] |
[blockMesh] BlockMesh documentation User Guide clearance of mergePatchPairs proposals |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 9, 2008, 03:22 |
BlockMesh documentation User Guide clearance of mergePatchPairs proposals
|
#1 |
Member
Ruben I. Mukhamadeev
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Obninsk, Kaluga reg., Russian Federation
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 17 |
Maintainers & collegues-users !
The first, i have a proposal to improve (as i think now) documentation of blockMesh utility in User Guide for more clearance (especially for beginners). They are concerned with mergePatchPairs part - face merging definition. I think, this part would be updated with point and example: - Master patch - is the patch, that could be merged totally, slave patch - be present without merged faces; - To merge end of cylinder and face of box, this faces should be defined each as single patch, not as a part of big patch (box-wall or/and cyl-wall), after that they are merged with mergePatchPairs clearly: (end-of-cyl box-face-left). For example : patches ( ... patch end-of-cylinder ( ( 8 9 13 12) ( patch box-face-left ( ( 3 2 6 7) ) ... ); mergePatchPairs ( (end-of-cylinder box-face-left) ); May be, it's a clear for maintainers and authors, but i spent 1.5 mounth to understand, that blockMesh is a Very Powerfull Tool for meshing. And the second - may be create a special topic with FAQ for the base utilities, where could be brought proposals of improving documentation - as from authors as from users - that could make this forum more effective as support and improve documentation ? /* Sorry for bad english */ Ruben |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX User Guide query | siw | CFX | 0 | August 21, 2008 04:15 |
Re: FLUENT 6.2 User Guide | Ahmad Hussain | FLUENT | 8 | August 16, 2005 16:21 |
user guide | pratap | FLUENT | 3 | May 25, 2005 08:13 |
User guide 6.1 | Geremi | FLUENT | 2 | March 28, 2005 09:33 |
Fluent 6.1 user guide | dingdong | FLUENT | 6 | May 17, 2004 12:17 |