|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Mesh Inconsistencies with snappyHexMesh Using runParallel |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 3, 2024, 13:33 |
Mesh Inconsistencies with snappyHexMesh Using runParallel
|
#1 |
New Member
Issei Nakasone
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone,
I am encountering an issue with `snappyHexMesh` when running in parallel using `runParallel`. - When running `snappyHexMesh` in single-core mode, everything works perfectly, and the mesh passes all checks (`checkMesh` results are fine). - However, when I use `runParallel`, mesh inconsistencies occur. It seems like that the `sanp` and `addLayers` doesn't perform. ### Additional Information: 1. **Environment Details:** - OpenFOAM version: v2306. - Number of processors used: 16. 2. **Error Observed:** - After running in parallel, the mesh shows inconsistencies like: - These issues do not occur in single-core runs. 3. **Configuration:** - snappyHexMesh: https://webapp-doc-images.s3.ap-nort...ppyHexMeshDict - decomposeParDict: https://webapp-doc-images.s3.ap-nort...composeParDict - Allrun: https://webapp-doc-images.s3.ap-nort...aws.com/Allrun - log.snappyHexMesh: https://webapp-doc-images.s3.ap-nort....snappyHexMesh ### Question: - What could be causing these mesh inconsistencies when using parallel processing? - Are there specific steps or best practices to ensure consistent meshing with `snappyHexMesh` in parallel mode? Any insights or troubleshooting advice would be greatly appreciated! |
|
December 6, 2024, 10:33 |
Check the decomposition method
|
#2 |
New Member
Skill-Lync CFD
Join Date: Sep 2024
Location: Chennai
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 2 |
What decomposition method are you using?
Generally, the type of decomposition could affect the feature capturing capabilities. Try to keep the decomposition to simple or hierarchical to achieve best results. |
|
December 8, 2024, 20:41 |
face area mismatch in snappyHexMesh
|
#3 |
New Member
Kosuke Yoshida
Join Date: Dec 2024
Location: Yokohama
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
It seems your issue is related to the following error message found in log.snappyHexMesh.
Code:
[1] --> FOAM FATAL ERROR: (openfoam-2306) [1] face 135 area does not match neighbour by 0.0317069% -- possible face ordering problem. patch:procBoundary1to2 my area:0.00312538 neighbour area:0.00312438 matching tolerance:4.0629e-07 Has anyone encountered and resolved a similar issue? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
sliding mesh problem in CFX | Saima | CFX | 46 | September 11, 2021 08:38 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh stuck when snap is turned on | yukuns | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 3 | February 2, 2021 14:05 |
[snappyHexMesh] Creating multiple multiple cell zones with snappyHexMesh - a newbie in deep water! | divergence | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | January 23, 2019 05:17 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh & Mesh around a missile | sasanghomi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | October 15, 2014 20:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh not generate mesh first time | mavimo | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | August 26, 2008 08:08 |