|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Could "multiply connected" points or edges cause diverge? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 25, 2022, 05:14 |
Could "multiply connected" points or edges cause diverge?
|
#1 |
Member
cal
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: nowhere
Posts: 65
Rep Power: 6 |
Hi,
When I'm dealing with complex geometries, after snappyHexMesh process checkMesh results says Mesh OK but topology checking says there are some "multiply connected (shared edge)". Could this cause diverge?. Is it safe to run? Does anyone know how I can get rid of the "multiply connected edges/points"? Should I make finer mesh? Maybe better surface snapping? Because there are spheres inside a closed cylinder, so I think it should be "ok (closed singly connected)". I'm open to any advice. checkTopologySourceCode: Code:
if (pp.empty()) { Info<< setw(34) << "ok (empty)"; } else if (pTyp == TopoType::MANIFOLD) { if (pp.checkPointManifold(true, &points)) { Info<< setw(34) << "multiply connected (shared point)"; } else { Info<< setw(34) << "ok (closed singly connected)"; } // Add points on non-manifold edges to make set complete pp.checkTopology(false, &points); } else { pp.checkTopology(false, &points); if (pTyp == TopoType::OPEN) { Info<< setw(34) << "ok (non-closed singly connected)"; } else { Info<< setw(34) << "multiply connected (shared edge)"; } } Code:
Mesh stats points: 37098025 faces: 87221635 internal faces: 75475098 cells: 26523205 faces per cell: 6.13412795 boundary patches: 4 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 2 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 18899402 prisms: 1068551 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 47833 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 6507419 Breakdown of polyhedra by number of faces: faces number of cells 4 1767222 5 1586543 6 1044033 7 90552 8 111201 9 1031071 10 11754 11 62767 12 457937 13 2811 14 17900 15 238408 16 441 17 3181 18 81216 19 30 20 147 21 204 23 1 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology wall_0 37509 40103 ok (non-closed singly connected) z_min_0 16125 17664 ok (non-closed singly connected) z_max_0 5445 5536 ok (non-closed singly connected) STL_spheres_0 11687458 14793403 multiply connected (shared edge) Checking faceZone topology for multiply connected surfaces... No faceZones found. <<Writing 8 conflicting points to set nonManifoldPoints Checking basic cellZone addressing... CellZone Cells Points VolumeBoundingBox square 11303831 15727867 3.72084787e-05 (-0.0163277587 -0.0163367696 0) (0.0163284519 0.0163441464 0.051) innerCircle 15219374 21468444 7.8549991e-05 (-0.0304956394 -0.0304956173 0) (0.0304955704 0.0304956245 0.051) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-0.0304956394 -0.0304956173 0) (0.0304955704 0.0304956245 0.051) Mesh has 3 geometric (non-empty/wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh has 3 solution (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (8.44454098e-16 -1.32861261e-17 -4.11133345e-16) OK. Max cell openness = 4.48864509e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 7.78430253 OK. Minimum face area = 2.70347356e-11. Maximum face area = 8.30936157e-07. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 1.00947652e-15. Max volume = 5.66587799e-10. Total volume = 0.00011575847. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 54.9999168 average: 14.9758969 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. ***Max skewness = 4.92403691, 10 highly skew faces detected which may impair the quality of the results <<Writing 10 skew faces to set skewFaces Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Failed 1 mesh checks. End Said. Last edited by saidc.; February 25, 2022 at 12:31. |
|
Tags |
checkmesh, openfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SimpleFoam & Theater | jipai | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | June 18, 2019 11:11 |
[blockMesh] BlockMeshmergePatchPairs | hjasak | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 11 | August 15, 2008 08:36 |
Defining a surface from points or edges in CFXpost | Gui | CFX | 9 | July 26, 2007 16:12 |
ICEM clustering of mesh points and multiple edges | webhaw | CFX | 4 | July 25, 2007 17:29 |
Defining a surface from edges or points in CFXpost | Gui | CFX | 0 | July 25, 2007 17:03 |