|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Problem with snappyHexMesh overwrite |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 9, 2017, 01:19 |
Problem with snappyHexMesh overwrite
|
#1 |
New Member
Manideep Reddy
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Hii all,
I have a very simple problem. When I run the command '' snappyHexMesh -overwrite '' after blockMesh and surfaceFeatureExtract, the boundary file in constant/polymesh folder is not showing all the patches of my geometry. Infact if I just run ''snappyHexMesh'' and copy the latest time mesh's polymesh folder, everything is working fine. What could have been the problem..? Regards, Manideep Reddy. |
|
September 11, 2017, 01:44 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Frederik
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 11 |
Depending on your OF version, you should use
"snappyHexMesh -constant" for the effect you want. The -overwrite flag overwrites the current timestep on which you are running SHM. The -constant flag overwrites the case/constant/polymesh files. You can always use the -help flag to see an explanation for the utility. Code:
<User:> snappyHexMesh -help Usage: snappyHexMesh [OPTIONS] options: -case <dir> specify alternate case directory, default is the cwd -checkGeometry check all surface geometry for quality -constant Output mesh to constant -noFunctionObjects do not execute functionObjects -overwrite overwrite existing mesh/results files -parallel run in parallel -region <word> Create a mesh region -roots <(dir1 .. dirN)> slave root directories for distributed running -time <scalar> Output mesh to specified time -writeDict Write out mesh dictionary file -writeLevel write pointLevel and cellLevel postprocessing files -srcDoc display source code in browser -doc display application documentation in browser -help print the usage |
|
September 12, 2017, 00:26 |
Solved my problem.
|
#3 |
New Member
Manideep Reddy
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 9 |
Thanks all .. I solved my problem. There was a problem with dimensions of the geometry. The dimensions in STL file are very large compared to bock mesh dict. So the problem arises..
|
|
December 3, 2018, 13:30 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Sarath
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Spain
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 9 |
From version 5.0, There is no option like -constant. And however I have a similar issue while using the overwrite flag. Does anyone else encountered similar issues or solution for this?
|
|
March 28, 2019, 05:55 |
|
#5 | |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Germany
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 8 |
Quote:
simmilar issue - no solution yet. Did you find anything? Edit*: my current work arount is using ext-3.1 for mesh generation. There -overwrite still edits polymesh/boundary Last edited by Goddi; March 28, 2019 at 07:06. |
||
March 28, 2019, 06:12 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Sarath
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Spain
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 9 |
||
July 29, 2023, 02:05 |
|
#7 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Location: India
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 3 |
It would be helpful if you could try and clarify certain doubts which are seemingly simple but for which I have not been able to find clear answers yet.
1) How to run in openFOAM simultaneously while visualising in paraFoam? 2) What files to execute in openFOAM before viewing in paraFoam an already run program? |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Problem with decomposePar, snappyHexMesh | luca1992 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 12 | August 23, 2017 20:06 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh problem | cfdsolver1 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | June 23, 2016 11:09 |
[snappyHexMesh] Problem handling with subdictionary in SnappyHexMesh | Lorenzo92 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | November 21, 2015 14:57 |
[snappyHexMesh] Problem with snappyhexMesh: modelling a pore chamber and pore throat model | Saideep | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 5 | May 10, 2015 15:46 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh - problem using *.obj file | inf.vish | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 4 | October 7, 2013 04:54 |