|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Geometry disappears when using SnappyHexMesh with multiple blocks |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 1, 2015, 10:03 |
Geometry disappears when using SnappyHexMesh with multiple blocks
|
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
Hey Foamers,
I am facing a problem with my mesh. I want to simulate a 3d swept wing in a box. The box looks like in the attached picture. It consists of 3 boxes (upper, middle, lower). If I run snappyHexMesh I end up with a smaller box outside my stl file (photo also attached). I don't understand where I went wrong. Do I have to enter multiple location in mesh points or do I have to merge the patches of my blocks in blockMesh? Thank you very much in advance for your help!!!!!!! |
|
February 2, 2015, 15:31 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 |
A few possibilities. If your STL file is not water tight, then you may have issues with the volumes being closed from each other.
Also, when you have the three regions, are you trying to mesh three separate closed domains with snappyHex? If so, you will need to stitch them together afterward. Or, you could use refinement regions to get better resolution on a base mesh without having separate volumes. |
|
February 3, 2015, 09:01 |
|
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 14 |
thank you for the reply.
SolidWorks says that there are no open sections so I assume the geometry should be closed. I try to mesh an aerofoil (it lies in the middle block) and I created the three boxes because I thought it will give me a better mesh ( I wanted to apply a meshing system like you use in ICEM). The blocks I have created should be already merged together because I created them on shared points. I didnt use merge patches though. I am generally not sure if multi-blocking is a good strategy to mesh with snappy anyway... Do you have any recommendations by any chance? Because I am absolutely stuck. |
|
February 3, 2015, 13:19 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Marco A. Turcios
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 740
Rep Power: 28 |
Quote:
http://www.openfoam.org/docs/user/snappyHexMesh.php Good luck! |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Joints of a geometry not snapped well (SnappyHexMesh) | malini1408 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 1 | April 15, 2019 13:09 |
[snappyHexMesh] Creating multiple multiple cell zones with snappyHexMesh - a newbie in deep water! | divergence | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | January 23, 2019 05:17 |
[snappyHexMesh] Problem and doubts with blockMesh, snappyHexMesh and multiple geometry | luca1992 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | August 23, 2017 12:40 |
[Commercial meshers] converting Fluent mesh to openfoam standard mesh | deepesh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 31 | March 29, 2017 06:59 |
vitual _ real | deneb | FLUENT | 3 | January 22, 2007 05:31 |