|
[Sponsors] |
[snappyHexMesh] Can snappyHexMesh handle intersecting geometries? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
January 14, 2015, 14:03 |
Can snappyHexMesh handle intersecting geometries?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi all,
can snappyHexMesh handle geometries (closed STL/OBJ shells), that intersect each other? Will the algorithm identify these geometries as one and create a mesh around them, or I need to unite the two geometries? Also, what happens when the geometry "sticks out" of the domain of the background mesh? Thanks in advance! |
|
January 20, 2015, 17:57 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Patrick Greene
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 12 |
If part of your geometry sticks out of the background mesh, that part will simply be cut off.
As for your question about intersecting geometries, I'm not sure what you're referring to. If, as I think, you mean that some part of your geometry overlaps, I'm not sure what sHM will do. I suspect you are correct in that it will consider only those regions which are unambiguously "outside" your geometry as outside, and anything else as "inside". But there's only really one way to find out. Try it! Let me know your result. Last edited by P Greene; January 20, 2015 at 18:03. Reason: Clarification and omition of unnecessary detail |
|
January 21, 2015, 07:06 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 17 |
Hi Patrick, thanks for your input.
On intersecting I mean not only overlapping, but penetrating geometries (e.g. a cylinder goes into a cube). What will be meshed in this case? The union of the geometries, or the mesh will go inside somehow? Hope somebody else can also make an input. Nevertheless, I will try it out on a simple geometry! |
|
January 16, 2022, 06:27 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Berlin
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Attesz,
old thread for sure, but i have the exact same question right now - so... beeing lazy to try my self (and for the sake of thread-completeness): Do you remember what your final conclusions were? Did you try it? |
|
January 16, 2022, 16:38 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Attesz
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Munich
Posts: 368
Rep Power: 17 |
Yes - snappy handles intersecting geometries as they were united. The intersection will not necessarily be captured properly however. It is better to avoid intersection if possible and use one high quality closed surface mesh.
|
|
January 16, 2022, 19:39 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Berlin
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 |
Thank you for the quick reply! So it seems that this is not a use-case of snappy and merely works by accident but may produce artifacts. Then I have to think of another solution, thanks again!
|
|
Tags |
intersecting geometry |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[CAD formats] Creating waterproof STL using snappyHexMesh or salome | Tobi | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 58 | May 13, 2020 07:01 |
[snappyHexMesh] Running snappyHexMesh in parallel - optimizing | peterhess | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | January 3, 2018 03:54 |
[snappyHexMesh] Error in meshing process with snappyHexMesh and different geometries | JoSchl | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | June 27, 2017 05:13 |
[snappyHexMesh] snappyHexMesh for Intersecting surfaces | Anamitra | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | June 14, 2016 06:38 |
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh complex geometries amp thin wall parts | hsieh | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | September 22, 2008 18:34 |