|
[Sponsors] |
[Other] CheckMesh vs CheckMesh -allGeometry -allTopology |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
December 16, 2014, 05:14 |
CheckMesh vs CheckMesh -allGeometry -allTopology
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12 |
Hello dear Foamers,
I am a new user to OpenFoam.I have been trying to simulate the flow in a Valve.The solutions diverged and so I starting debugging my setup. To start with,I did checkMesh and everythin was 'ok' and I ran the simulation.But now I did a complete meshcheck and I see a few warnings and errors. (which might be the source of divergence) I have attached the checkMesh -allGeometry -allTopology output below. From the forum I could understand that concave cells and faces are not necessarily a threat to the convergence. These cells and faces are unfortunately spread all over the Valve.Cells with small determinant,warped faces happen to be the other errors. I will attach the pics of these faces and cells,as well as a slice of my mesh. I don't know if the pics give as much clarity as I wanted. I will provide more info if needed. Kindly help me.Any tips and hints will be of great help.Thanks. Code:
CHECKMESH -allGeometry -allTopology Create time Create polyMesh for time = 0 Enabling all (cell, face, edge, point) topology checks. Enabling all geometry checks. Time = 0 Mesh stats points: 5800847 faces: 16111264 internal faces: 15551508 cells: 5172099 faces per cell: 6.12184 boundary patches: 5 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 4634186 prisms: 150126 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 1817 tetrahedra: 8 polyhedra: 385962 Breakdown of polyhedra by number of faces: faces number of cells 4 33452 5 22367 6 76411 7 69622 8 19837 9 93654 10 1421 11 396 12 50423 13 48 14 56 15 16255 16 4 17 13 18 1576 20 3 21 361 24 63 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Topological cell zip-up check OK. Face-face connectivity OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology Bounding box leftWall 0 0 ok (empty) defaultFaces 0 0 ok (empty) Valve_Inlet 22153 28444 ok (non-closed singly connected) (0.574884 -0.0725724 -0.0726628) (0.575 0.0725739 0.0726582) Valve_Outlet 7132 9634 ok (non-closed singly connected) (-1.175 -0.0725353 -0.0726304) (-1.17454 0.072542 0.0726303) Valve_Wall 530471 576275 ok (non-closed singly connected) (-1.175 -0.101373 -0.120015) (0.575 0.101373 0.0901) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-1.175 -0.101373 -0.120015) (0.575 0.101373 0.0901) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (2.72347e-15 1.09433e-15 6.58078e-15) OK. Max cell openness = 3.31988e-15 OK. Max aspect ratio = 70.5339 OK. Minimum face area = 6.20277e-09. Maximum face area = 0.000151314. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 3.0642e-12. Max volume = 1.73353e-06. Total volume = 0.0314532. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 64.9982 average: 7.81883 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 2.15949 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Face tets OK. Min/max edge length = 1.16846e-05 0.0126579 OK. *There are 2959 faces with concave angles between consecutive edges. Max concave angle = 79.9922 degrees. <<Writing 2959 faces with concave angles to set concaveFaces Face flatness (1 = flat, 0 = butterfly) : average = 0.99964 min = 0.64177 *There are 63 faces with ratio between projected and actual area < 0.8 Minimum ratio (minimum flatness, maximum warpage) = 0.64177 <<Writing 63 warped faces to set warpedFaces Cell determinant (wellposedness) : minimum: 2.71366e-05 average: 7.71483 ***Cells with small determinant (< 0.001) found, number of cells: 6182 <<Writing 6182 under-determined cells to set underdeterminedCells ***Concave cells (using face planes) found, number of cells: 186108 <<Writing 186108 concave cells to set concaveCells Failed 2 mesh checks. End |
|
December 19, 2014, 05:08 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 12 |
Anybody??!
|
|
June 25, 2019, 05:55 |
|
#3 |
Member
Owais Shabbir
Join Date: May 2019
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 7 |
Hi Nagesh,
Have you found any answers to your question posted some time ago. If yes, please share. Thanks Have a nice day OS |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Other] Sysmalloc on checkMesh in foam-ext but not in openfoam | HenrikJohansson | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | July 3, 2018 04:54 |
[Gmsh] CheckMesh problem | laouichi sif | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | March 26, 2016 19:14 |
checkMesh / mesh errors | andybond13 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 0 | June 10, 2015 14:05 |
[mesh manipulation] checkMesh Erros after refineMesh | mgdenno | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 10 | October 14, 2014 06:16 |
checkMesh Errors after refineMesh | mgdenno | OpenFOAM | 0 | July 30, 2012 22:39 |