|
[Sponsors] |
[blockMesh] Grading leads to simpleFoam crash |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 2, 2014, 06:28 |
Grading leads to simpleFoam crash
|
#1 |
New Member
Yanyan Huang
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi guys,
I'm currently doing some research on wall functions with a empty 2D domain. The Mesh is generated by blockmesh and the simpleFoam solver ist used. Everything is working well in parallel and serial, but if I turn on the Grading in the z-direction (perpendicular to the ground) the Solver crashes producing this Error message: Time = 1 smoothSolver: Solving for Ux, Initial residual = nan, Final residual = nan, No Iterations 1000 smoothSolver: Solving for Uz, Initial residual = nan, Final residual = nan, No Iterations 1000 GAMG: Solving for p, Initial residual = nan, Final residual = nan, No Iterations 1000 time step continuity errors : sum local = nan, global = nan, cumulative = nan smoothSolver: Solving for epsilon, Initial residual = nan, Final residual = nan, No Iterations 1000 smoothSolver: Solving for k, Initial residual = nan, Final residual = nan, No Iterations 1000 ExecutionTime = 0.53 s ClockTime = 1 s --> FOAM FATAL IO ERROR: wrong token type - expected Scalar, found on line 0 the word 'nan' file: /local/huangya/OpenFOAM/huangya-2.2.0/run/foam/2d_mesh_para_empty_grading/system/data.solverPerformance.U at line 0. From function operator>>(Istream&, Scalar&) in file lnInclude/Scalar.C at line 91. FOAM exiting This happens only for the grading in z-direction and not for the x-direction. Are there any limitations that I missed using simpleFoam with graded meshs? Thanks for your time! |
|
March 2, 2014, 07:43 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lieven
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Leuven, Belgium
Posts: 299
Rep Power: 22 |
Dear Yanyan,
Welcome to the forum! For us to help us, you should provide a little bit more information. Could you give us the output of 'checkMesh'? Which are the boundary conditions that you impose? What are the discretization schemes (fvSchemes)? Cheers, Lieven |
|
March 2, 2014, 07:54 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Yanyan Huang
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi Lieven,
Here is the output of CheckMesh: Code:
Mesh stats points: 3402 internal points: 0 faces: 6500 internal faces: 3100 cells: 1600 faces per cell: 6 boundary patches: 5 point zones: 0 face zones: 0 cell zones: 0 Overall number of cells of each type: hexahedra: 1600 prisms: 0 wedges: 0 pyramids: 0 tet wedges: 0 tetrahedra: 0 polyhedra: 0 Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces... Patch Faces Points Surface topology outlet 20 42 ok (non-closed singly connected) sides 3200 3402 ok (non-closed singly connected) inlet 20 42 ok (non-closed singly connected) ground 80 162 ok (non-closed singly connected) top 80 162 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (0 0 0) (5000 1 500) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 0 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 0 1) All edges aligned with or perpendicular to non-empty directions. Boundary openness (-5.67186378575e-21 -6.11290791373e-16 0) OK. Max cell openness = 1.35710844948e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 9.98190321022 OK. Minimum face area = 6.26133099908. Maximum face area = 3913.33187443. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 391.333187443. Max volume = 3913.33187443. Total volume = 2500000. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 0 average: 0 Non-orthogonality check OK. Face pyramids OK. Max skewness = 3.63068469086e-13 OK. Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. Mesh OK. End Code:
FoamFile { version 2.0; format ascii; class dictionary; object fvSchemes; } // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * // ddtSchemes { default steadyState; } gradSchemes { default Gauss linear; } divSchemes { default none; div(phi,U) bounded Gauss upwind; div((nuEff*dev(T(grad(U))))) Gauss linear; div(phi,epsilon) bounded Gauss upwind; div(phi,k) bounded Gauss upwind; } laplacianSchemes { default Gauss linear limited corrected 0.333; } interpolationSchemes { default linear; } snGradSchemes { default limited corrected 0.333; } fluxRequired { default no; p; } // ************************************************************************* // Thanks! |
|
March 2, 2014, 12:08 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Yanyan Huang
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13 |
I solved the problem. There was a mistake with the BC at the Inlet.
|
|
Tags |
blockmesh, grading, simplefoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interFoam vs. simpleFoam channel flow comparison | DanM | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 12 | January 31, 2020 16:26 |
simpleFoam crash fast! | izna | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 28 | February 3, 2017 14:24 |
SimpleFoam crash at first loop | alvariten | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | August 17, 2015 08:17 |
Bigger wave height leads to crash (interFoam) | David* | OpenFOAM | 6 | November 14, 2011 03:53 |
simpleFoam crash -> How to solve | tH3f0rC3 | OpenFOAM | 4 | May 12, 2011 08:07 |