|
[Sponsors] |
May 7, 2013, 05:59 |
Mesh quality after snappyHex
|
#1 |
Member
Luca
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
i'm running the case of a flow inside a rough channel. I'm trying to generate a proper mesh. The bottom roughness is formed by small cubical blocks. Each block's surface mesh should be formed by approximately 4 cells in the vertical direction and 2 cells in the two horizontal directions (although the refined cells should be about 2.5 units wide, while the blocks are 4.5 units wide, so a BIT LESS than 2 cells). After snappyHex, however, i ran checkMesh and the result is the following Code:
Checking topology... Boundary definition OK. Cell to face addressing OK. Point usage OK. Upper triangular ordering OK. Face vertices OK. Number of regions: 1 (OK). Checking patch topology for multiply connected surfaces ... Patch Faces Points Surface topology in 6410 6743 ok (non-closed singly connected) out 5600 5781 ok (non-closed singly connected) left 18367 19132 ok (non-closed singly connected) right 18367 19132 ok (non-closed singly connected) top 56000 56541 ok (non-closed singly connected) bottom 510205 595645 ok (non-closed singly connected) spires_patch0 46711 48691 ok (non-closed singly connected) roughness_patch0 603177 690348 ok (non-closed singly connected) hangar_patch0 38240 38481 ok (non-closed singly connected) Checking geometry... Overall domain bounding box (-10 -7 -0.00139171) (30 7 4) Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 1) Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 1) Boundary openness (3.74041e-16 1.31646e-15 -1.22914e-13) OK. Max cell openness = 4.21681e-16 OK. Max aspect ratio = 5.83191 OK. Minumum face area = 1.76458e-05. Maximum face area = 0.0200125. Face area magnitudes OK. Min volume = 6.93409e-07. Max volume = 0.00200123. Total volume = 2237.84. Cell volumes OK. Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 57.4584 average: 12.2611 Non-orthogonality check OK. ***Error in face pyramids: 7 faces are incorrectly oriented. <<Writing 7 faces with incorrect orientation to set wrongOrientedFaces ***Max skewness = 7.12497, 102 highly skew faces detected which may impair the quality of the results <<Writing 102 skew faces to set skewFaces Coupled point location match (average 0) OK. I don't know if these informations are enough. If you need to know more i can post some screenshots or others dicts. Thank you very much |
|
May 10, 2013, 06:39 |
|
#2 |
Member
Akshay Kumar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: India
Posts: 84
Rep Power: 16 |
Hey Luca
Firstly check where these cells are located. Use foamToVTK -faceSet to write them in the vtk format and use paraview to view them. Then think of ways to refine those areas to get a better mesh. Ak |
|
May 15, 2013, 01:46 |
|
#3 |
Member
Luca
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks Akshay. I will try this way
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 10:38 |
Polyhedral Mesh Quality in Star-CCM+ | niazaliahmed | STAR-CCM+ | 3 | March 8, 2012 14:51 |
[ICEM] Tetra mesh quality before and after prism layer | Chander | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | December 25, 2011 23:04 |
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 12:55 |
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? | Joe | CFX | 2 | March 26, 2007 19:10 |