|
[Sponsors] |
[Commercial meshers] different results for meshes produced by gambit and ICEM |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 23, 2012, 04:11 |
different results for meshes produced by gambit and ICEM
|
#1 |
Member
zakir
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 15 |
hi everyone
For a simple pipe flow,which size is 0.5X4,I used gambit and ICEM to produce .msh files.After converting the .msh files with command fluentMeshToFoam or fluent3DMeshToFoam,I ran the command icoFoam.What interested me is the big differences between the two case.And I found that the result with the mesh produced by gambit was correct,the other was wrong. So who can tell me what is wrong with it? Regards! zakir |
|
Tags |
gambit and icem |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[ICEM] Switching to ICEM from GAMBIT | miro2000 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 3 | December 5, 2014 05:32 |
[ICEM] Different meshes from ICEM and GAMBIT | Mojtaba.a | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 9 | March 30, 2013 03:42 |
[ICEM] ICEM sizing function >>> Gambit and Ansys meshing | Far | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | March 3, 2013 11:17 |
[ICEM] Gambit to ICEM, any advices ? | Santos-Dumont | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 15 | February 28, 2012 20:07 |
[ICEM] Gambit to Openfoam, Gambit to ICEM to Openfoam | Rickard.Solsjo | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 7 | November 30, 2011 11:20 |