|
[Sponsors] |
[Other] performance linux vs. windows (VirtualBox) |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 3, 2018, 05:26 |
performance linux vs. windows (VirtualBox)
|
#1 |
Member
Jan Potac
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 30
Rep Power: 17 |
Since sharing a pc with other users (win only users), I am wondering how is the performance (parallel) of OF run in Linux compared to OF run in Virtualbox.
Any experience? |
|
April 15, 2018, 19:03 |
|
#2 |
Retired Super Moderator
Bruno Santos
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 10,981
Blog Entries: 45
Rep Power: 128 |
Quick answer: I don't have any recent numbers, but the last ones I have are posted here: https://sourceforge.net/p/bluecfd-sc...ntimes202_211/ - and they were for 32-bit comparison, but they might still be comparable today.
Based on a couple of quick calculations, based on those values, it's possible to expect 5 to 25% slower simulation time, when using virtualization, instead of running a Linux Distribution directly as a normal installation. On Phoronix, for more general benchmarks, you can also find several benchmarks for VirtualBox vs native installations: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...h&q=VirtualBox - The most recent on this topic was the following, which also includes WSL: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pa...-february-2018
__________________
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFX11 + Fortran compiler ? | Mohan | CFX | 20 | March 30, 2011 19:56 |
Dual Boot Windows and Linux and Go Open Source | andyj | Main CFD Forum | 2 | October 21, 2010 17:49 |
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.7.0 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 3 | September 8, 2010 07:25 |
Cross-compiling OpenFOAM 1.6 on Linux for Windows 32 and 64bits with Mingw-w64 | wyldckat | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 7 | January 19, 2010 16:39 |
Linux to Windows (dual boot system) | Alex | Main CFD Forum | 9 | May 3, 2007 04:36 |