[gschaider]

Originally Posted by RitaFC

I thank you for your reply.
Perhaps Bison is not correctely installed.
1 - I download swak4Foam withot problems. In which directhory it should be placed ?
2 - Moving to the swak4Foam directory - Doing "./Allwmake" - Appears:
No 'swakConfiguration'. Python etc won't work
Checking swak4Foam- version and generating file
./Allwmake: 9: ... not found
./Allwmake: 17: ... not found
./Allwmake: 19: bison: not found
Bison is version
...
Can you give me a opinion what to do ?
Kind regards,
Rita

"Install bison and flex" is the best I can offer. Does

which bison

show an installed bison?

BTW: what do the "..." in your output mean. Or are the really there?

[RitaFC]

Originally Posted by gschaider

"Install bison and flex" is the best I can offer. Does

which bison

show an installed bison?

BTW: what do the "..." in your output mean. Or are the really there?

Hi
I'm sorry to borrow you again but in a different computer with ubuntu 10.10,
I started all the instalations again: m4,bison with libiconv, flex from the root I had no errors and after:
1. svn checkout https://openfoam-extend.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openfoam-extend/trunk/Breeder_1.7/libraries/swak4Foam/
I had a warning=> Fetching external item into 'swak4Foam/Libraries/simpleFunctionObjects'
svn: warning: 'swak4Foam/Libraries/simpleFunctionObjects' is already a working copy for a different URL
2. ./Allwmake
root@ubuntu:~/swak4Foam# ./Allwmake
No 'swakConfiguration'. Python etc won't work
Checking swak4Foam-version and generating file
./Allwmake: line 32: wmake: command not found
Requirements for Library not satisfied. I see no sense in going on
root@ubuntu:~/swak4Foam#

Would you be so kind to answer me again. Perhaps you have an idea what I am doing wrong !
Kind regards, Rita

[RitaFC]

Originally Posted by gschaider

"Install bison and flex" is the best I can offer. Does

which bison

show an installed bison?

BTW: what do the "..." in your output mean. Or are the really there?

Just to complement : when download swak4Foam from home in ubuntu 10.10 with openFoam 1.7 or ubuntu 11.10 with openFoam 2.1:

rita@ubuntu:~/swak4Foam$ ./Allwmake
No 'swakConfiguration'. Python etc won't work
Checking swak4Foam-version and generating file
./Allwmake: 9: [[: not found
./Allwmake: 17: [[: not found
Bison is version 2.4.1
./Allwmake: 33: cannot open 2.3: No such file
./Allwmake: 33: [[: not found
OpenFOAM-version: Major 2 Minor 1 Patch 0
./Allwmake: 67: [[: not found
No change to swak4FoamParsers/foamVersion4swak.H
SOURCE=FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.C ; g++ -m32 -Dlinux -DWM_DP -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wold-style-cast -O3 -DNoRepository -ftemplate-depth-100 -IMake/linuxGccDPOpt -I/opt/openfoam210/src/finiteVolume/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/sampling/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/triSurface/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/lagrangian/basic/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/meshTools/lnInclude -IlnInclude -I. -I/opt/openfoam210/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/OSspecific/POSIX/lnInclude -fPIC -c $SOURCE -o Make/linuxGccDPOpt/FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.o
In file included from lnInclude/SubsetValueExpressionParser_location.hh:44:0,
from SubsetValueExpressionParser.tab.hh:65,
from SubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:60,
from SetSubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:48,
from FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.H:52,
from FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.C:34:
position.hh: In function ‘bool parserSubset:perator==(const parserSubset:osition&, const parserSubset:osition&)’:
position.hh:136:69: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ [-Wparentheses]
...

In file included from lnInclude/SubsetValueExpressionParser_location.hh:44:0,
from SubsetValueExpressionParser.tab.hh:65,
from SubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:60,
from SetSubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:48,
from CellSetValueExpressionDriver.H:52,
from CellSetValueExpressionDriver.C:34:
position.hh: In function ‘bool parserSubset:perator==(const parserSubset:osition&, const parserSubset:osition&)’:
position.hh:136:69: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ [-Wparentheses]

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by RitaFC

Hi
I'm sorry to borrow you again but in a different computer with ubuntu 10.10,
I started all the instalations again: m4,bison with libiconv, flex from the root I had no errors and after:
1. svn checkout https://openfoam-extend.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openfoam-extend/trunk/Breeder_1.7/libraries/swak4Foam/
I had a warning=> Fetching external item into 'swak4Foam/Libraries/simpleFunctionObjects'
svn: warning: 'swak4Foam/Libraries/simpleFunctionObjects' is already a working copy for a different URL
2. ./Allwmake
root@ubuntu:~/swak4Foam# ./Allwmake
No 'swakConfiguration'. Python etc won't work
Checking swak4Foam-version and generating file
./Allwmake: line 32: wmake: command not found
Requirements for Library not satisfied. I see no sense in going on
root@ubuntu:~/swak4Foam#

Would you be so kind to answer me again. Perhaps you have an idea what I am doing wrong !
Kind regards, Rita

In that case the wmake utility is not found. Reason is probably a problem with your OF installation on that machine. Nothing swak-specific (you probably can't compile ANY utilities on that machine)

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by RitaFC

Just to complement : when download swak4Foam from home in ubuntu 10.10 with openFoam 1.7 or ubuntu 11.10 with openFoam 2.1:

rita@ubuntu:~/swak4Foam$ ./Allwmake
No 'swakConfiguration'. Python etc won't work
Checking swak4Foam-version and generating file
./Allwmake: 9: [[: not found
./Allwmake: 17: [[: not found
Bison is version 2.4.1
./Allwmake: 33: cannot open 2.3: No such file
./Allwmake: 33: [[: not found
OpenFOAM-version: Major 2 Minor 1 Patch 0
./Allwmake: 67: [[: not found
No change to swak4FoamParsers/foamVersion4swak.H
SOURCE=FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.C ; g++ -m32 -Dlinux -DWM_DP -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Wold-style-cast -O3 -DNoRepository -ftemplate-depth-100 -IMake/linuxGccDPOpt -I/opt/openfoam210/src/finiteVolume/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/sampling/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/triSurface/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/lagrangian/basic/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/meshTools/lnInclude -IlnInclude -I. -I/opt/openfoam210/src/OpenFOAM/lnInclude -I/opt/openfoam210/src/OSspecific/POSIX/lnInclude -fPIC -c $SOURCE -o Make/linuxGccDPOpt/FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.o
In file included from lnInclude/SubsetValueExpressionParser_location.hh:44:0,
from SubsetValueExpressionParser.tab.hh:65,
from SubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:60,
from SetSubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:48,
from FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.H:52,
from FaceSetValueExpressionDriver.C:34:
position.hh: In function ‘bool parserSubset:perator==(const parserSubset:osition&, const parserSubset:osition&)’:
position.hh:136:69: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ [-Wparentheses]
...

In file included from lnInclude/SubsetValueExpressionParser_location.hh:44:0,
from SubsetValueExpressionParser.tab.hh:65,
from SubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:60,
from SetSubsetValueExpressionDriver.H:48,
from CellSetValueExpressionDriver.H:52,
from CellSetValueExpressionDriver.C:34:
position.hh: In function ‘bool parserSubset:perator==(const parserSubset:osition&, const parserSubset:osition&)’:
position.hh:136:69: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ [-Wparentheses]

That is the output on the other machine (the 11.10, right?). My shell-scripting skills are not good enough to know what exactly happened here. Maybe /bin/sh is now a different shell on Ubuntu (don't have that either). Try replacing the first line of Libraries/Allwmake which reads

#! /bin/sh

with

#! /bin/bash

and see whether it happens again

[RitaFC]

Sorry because I forget to report that the problem is solved.
I thank you for the answer.
In fact the file was already with "bash". But with a lot of patience and installations and verifing the text files in "swakconfiguration" and "the Files" the problem is solved and swak4Foam is working pretty well.
Thanks for that also.

Note: However the messages 9 not found and so on still appeared.

[newOFuser]

Hello all,

I am trying to study forced response of step combustor using a compressible solver with turbulence modeling.

Instead of imposing a fluctuating velocity at the inlet, I would like to use the inlet wave modulation technique (see attached figure from a paper).

Could some one please let me know if and how this could be implemented in OpenFOAM? Can groovyBC be used for this purpose? [I am sure there must be a way! ]

Thanks so much!
amit

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by newOFuser

Hello all,

I am trying to study forced response of step combustor using a compressible solver with turbulence modeling.

Instead of imposing a fluctuating velocity at the inlet, I would like to use the inlet wave modulation technique (see attached figure from a paper).

Could some one please let me know if and how this could be implemented in OpenFOAM? Can groovyBC be used for this purpose? [I am sure there must be a way! ]

Thanks so much!
amit

Quick glance at the paper says: Yes. Have a look at the pulsedPitzDaily-case that does something similar (of course you'll only need the real component of the complex exponential function given in the paper, but that is "Math 101")

[newOFuser]

Thanks for the reply! I am currently using the same formulations as implemented in pulsedPitzDaily to implement the IVM (velocity modulation) case. [Thanks for the groovyBC tool!]

However, I am not sure how to go about implementing IWM (wave modulation). The paper also says "To use IWM, however, codes must use boundary conditions based on characteristic methods". The determination of A's is also not very clear. Do you have any insights on this?

On another note, I also came across some work (F. Piscaglia, A. Montorfano) that mentioned that the waveTransmissive BC is not perfectly non-reflecting, and there has been some work in implementing NSCBC in openFoam, as well as acoustic sources. Is the work available in the public domain?

Thanks!
ak

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by newOFuser

Thanks for the reply! I am currently using the same formulations as implemented in pulsedPitzDaily to implement the IVM (velocity modulation) case. [Thanks for the groovyBC tool!]

However, I am not sure how to go about implementing IWM (wave modulation). The paper also says "To use IWM, however, codes must use boundary conditions based on characteristic methods". The determination of A's is also not very clear. Do you have any insights on this?

On another note, I also came across some work (F. Piscaglia, A. Montorfano) that mentioned that the waveTransmissive BC is not perfectly non-reflecting, and there has been some work in implementing NSCBC in openFoam, as well as acoustic sources. Is the work available in the public domain?

Don't know. Guess you'd best open a new thread with that thread as I don't think that the people who know will find the question in this thread

[ziemowitzima]

Hi
First of all , thanks for groovyBC !

I have a question. Is it possible to simulate directionMixed like BC using groovyBC ?
I am interesting in velocity BC.
I would like to have fixedValue (some time and space function) in the normal direction and some fixedGradient (again some time and space function) in the tangential direction.

Is groovyBCDirection suitable for this ? Unfortunately I could not find any example how to use it...
Is there any example how to use them ?

I tried sth like this:

sidesleft
{
type groovyBCDirection;
variables (
"yp=pts().y;"
"ep=1/0.0447213595499958;"
"para=-(1 + ep*pos().y*(2 - ep*pos().y))*normal();"
);
valueExpression "sin(time())*para";
gradientExpresion "cos(time())*para";
valueFraction (1 0 0 0 0 0);
value uniform (0 0 0);

}


It does not give any run time error, but I am not sure if it does what I would like ...

Many Thanks

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by ziemowitzima

Hi
First of all , thanks for groovyBC !

I have a question. Is it possible to simulate directionMixed like BC using groovyBC ?
I am interesting in velocity BC.
I would like to have fixedValue (some time and space function) in the normal direction and some fixedGradient (again some time and space function) in the tangential direction.

Is groovyBCDirection suitable for this ? Unfortunately I could not find any example how to use it...
Is there any example how to use them ?

I tried sth like this:

sidesleft
{
type groovyBCDirection;
variables (
"yp=pts().y;"
"ep=1/0.0447213595499958;"
"para=-(1 + ep*pos().y*(2 - ep*pos().y))*normal();"
);
valueExpression "sin(time())*para";
gradientExpresion "cos(time())*para";
valueFraction (1 0 0 0 0 0);
value uniform (0 0 0);

}


It does not give any run time error, but I am not sure if it does what I would like ...

Many Thanks

I guess the problem is that your valueFraction gets overwritten by the fractionExpression which defaults to "symmTensor(1,0,0,1,0,1)" (the one-matrix).

Check the value of valueFraction at later timesteps

[linch]

Hi folks,

is it possible to use a dimensionedScalar or a vector in groovyBC, not a field?

Best regards,
Illya

[akidess]

Illya, I think you need this: http://openfoamwiki.net/index.php/Contrib_IOReferencer

[ziemowitzima]

Hi Illay,
I am not sure if I understood your question.
But in groovyBC (and any other BC) you have to specify vector or a scalar ...

[akidess]

Any idea why

fractionExpression "sqr(normal());";

in groovyBCDirection leads to a syntax error, unexpected ')' ?

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by akidess

Any idea why

fractionExpression "sqr(normal());";

in groovyBCDirection leads to a syntax error, unexpected ')' ?

Well. normal() is a vector. sqr expects a scalar. The parser says "This can't be all". Something like "sqr(normal().x)" or "sqr(mag(normal()))" might work

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by linch

Hi folks,

is it possible to use a dimensionedScalar or a vector in groovyBC, not a field?

Best regards,
Illya

A dimensionedScalar defined in the program? No. There are some ways around (the IOreferencer described below is one of them). But to say which is the best it would be helpful if you described the problem you want to solve

[akidess]

Originally Posted by gschaider

Well. normal() is a vector. sqr expects a scalar. The parser says "This can't be all". Something like "sqr(normal().x)" or "sqr(mag(normal()))" might work

Foam::sqr will return a tensor when called with a vector, which is very handy for the fractionExpression of groovyBCDirection. Ok to file a bugrep?

[gschaider]

Originally Posted by akidess

Foam::sqr will return a tensor when called with a vector, which is very handy for the fractionExpression of groovyBCDirection. Ok to file a bugrep?

I wasn't aware of this. That's why it was not represented in the grammar.

That would be a simple fix to the grammar.

You don't have to ask to file a bug report. If I don't like them I will turn them down Yes. Please