|
[Sponsors] |
[waves2Foam] wave height decreases in downstream direction |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 22, 2015, 14:21 |
wave height decreases in downstream direction
|
#1 |
Member
Ali
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St John's Canada
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 13 |
Hi,
I am trying to simulate stokes first order waves in wave tank using waves2Foam in OF2.3.1. But the wave height gradually decreasing as time increase in downstream direction even in relaxation zone. My computational domain (-10 -4 -4) to (7 4 2). My inlet relaxation 7 to -2 and outlet relation zone from 5 to 10 and the wave is generated in negative X-direction. The attached figures are at 1sec, 5 sec and 11 sec respectively. For boundary conditions by I have used waveFlume boundary except the two sides are slip only. I have attached wave Properties input. I am trying to fixed these problem for last 2 weeks but could not fixed it. I appreciate your any kind of help or suggestion. Regards, Alifigure1.jpg figure2.jpg Figure3.jpg waveProperties.txt |
|
March 23, 2015, 11:19 |
|
#2 |
Member
carlos
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 37
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi Ali,
I think your relaxation zone covers most of your domain, only -2 to -5 is out. Try reducing the x dimension of each relaxation zone to 0.5 or 1 m and try. Regards, Carlos. |
|
March 23, 2015, 13:08 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37 |
Good afternoon,
@Ali: It is impossible to assist you with the provided information. Look for instance at the post by Xiantao (Stokesfirst wave profile asymetrical against the still water level??), which offers a lot of information. If you are using turbulence models, you should also include that information. Kind regards, Niels
__________________
Please note that I do not use the Friend-feature, so do not be offended, if I do not accept a request. Last edited by wyldckat; October 8, 2018 at 10:13. Reason: removed answer to another post that was on the main thread |
|
March 26, 2015, 11:16 |
|
#4 |
Member
Ali
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: St John's Canada
Posts: 31
Rep Power: 13 |
Good morning.
@Carlos: Thank you very much. I have reduced the relaxation zone at the both end and kept it 5 m as I will simulate a wave having length 4 m. I tried different mesh density in free surface region and found the accuracy in wave height increase with mesh density. @Niels: Thank you very much. From the next time I will provide more information when I will post a problem in this forum Ali |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulence dissipates too much energy for interFoam to simulate wave breaking | jasonchen | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | May 18, 2019 10:21 |
[waves2Foam] Waves2Foam Related Topics | ngj | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 660 | August 20, 2018 13:39 |
Max and min wave height variating in time with 5order stokes waves | lucaoggi | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | October 31, 2014 08:16 |
why downstream height is defined? | NITIN DEWANGAN | CFX | 5 | August 29, 2008 08:28 |
Terrible Mistake In Fluid Dynamics History | Abhi | Main CFD Forum | 12 | July 8, 2002 10:11 |