|
[Sponsors] |
[waves2Foam] Had some issues reconstructing the case for post-processing |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 5, 2016, 08:20 |
Had some issues reconstructing the case for post-processing
|
#1 |
Senior Member
ArielJ
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 11 |
I am trying to set up a case using waveFoam to run in parallel on a cluster. First though I am trying to test it on my own machine as I've had some issues reconstructing the case for post-processing. I'm attaching the images from paraview following reconstruction:
reconstructedCase_bottom.jpg reconstructedCase_inlet.jpg reconstructedCase_side.jpg reconstructedCase_top.jpg As you can see, the case *almost* looks ok from the top (except for some issues at the walls) but then is completely wrong from all other views. My decomposeParDict file looks like: Code:
numberOfSubdomains 2; method scotch; simpleCoeffs { n ( 2 1 1 ); delta 0.001; } hierarchicalCoeffs { n ( 1 1 1 ); delta 0.001; order xyz; } manualCoeffs { dataFile "cellDecomposition"; } Thank you!! EDIT: Ok I just tried to see where the issue is and it is definitely in how I am decomposing the relaxation zones...... is there an example of how to properly decompose the relaxation zones somewhere? Last edited by arieljeds; May 5, 2016 at 08:34. Reason: issue is with decomposing the relaxation zones |
|
May 5, 2016, 13:03 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
ArielJ
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi there, I'm going to answer my own questions since I seem to have figured out the problem...
I changed to scotch decomposition as I was not confident on how to properly decompose the geometry otherwise. This fixed the relaxation zone issue but then I realised that the problem had to do with setWaveField so I ran: Code:
blockMesh waveGaugesNProbes setWaveParameters mpirun -np 2 setWaveField - parallel mpirun -np 2 waveFoam -parallel > log |
|
May 5, 2016, 13:25 |
|
#3 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37 |
Hi Ariel,
Your observations makes very little sense in the context of how the relaxation zones are supposed to work (and based on my long experience). Therefore, can I ask you to prepare a case including an Allrun-script, where the problem can be reproduced. Then I will have a look. Furthermore, which OF version are you using? Kind regards Niels
__________________
Please note that I do not use the Friend-feature, so do not be offended, if I do not accept a request. |
|
May 5, 2016, 13:32 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
ArielJ
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi Niels,
As far as I can tell, what I was doing before was decomposing it strangely along the y (and I also tried z) axis, which, when I then used relaxationZoneLayout, seemed to decompose the relaxation zone itself weirdly. When I changed this and left it as scotch decomposition (meaning that I didn't put how to decompose the geometry in myself), the relaxation zones appeared correctly (as I think you said in an earlier post, the relaxation zones are local and shouldn't be affected by decomposition, so I think that I was confused in which applications/utilities to run using mpirun as well as the actual way the geometry was decomposed). I believe I have fixed the problem now by running setWaveField using mpirun -np 2. Before I did it this way, the wave field was not set in the separate processors.. I hope I haven't confused you more now! Would you still like me to provide a case with the allrun script? I can check shortly if the current simulation did actually work as expected. I am using OF version 2.4.0 Thank you for getting back to me, Ariel |
|
May 5, 2016, 19:44 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37 |
Yes, if the error is reproduceable, I would like to have the case.
Thanks, Niels
__________________
Please note that I do not use the Friend-feature, so do not be offended, if I do not accept a request. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
convergence issues with Roe Solver on transonic inviscid steady case | CarlosLozano | SU2 | 4 | March 4, 2018 06:23 |
Issues with symmetry patches perpendicular to outlets | sturgeon | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | October 9, 2017 10:46 |
Is Playstation 3 cluster suitable for CFD work | hsieh | OpenFOAM | 9 | August 16, 2015 15:53 |
Changing the grid on the same set-up | Katya | FLUENT | 7 | October 8, 2009 17:31 |
Free surface boudary conditions with SOLA-VOF | Fan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | September 9, 2006 13:24 |