|
[Sponsors] |
[waves2Foam] Velocities are far lower than what I am expecting |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 13, 2016, 09:11 |
Velocities are far lower than what I am expecting
|
#1 |
Senior Member
ArielJ
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi everyone,
I've been running waveFoam for a while but in an effort to understand OF and CFD so from a beginners view. I have just realised that my velocities are far lower than what I am expecting. I am using a potentialCurrent with U (0.5 0 0), to simulate flow around a cylinder, so I expect to see velocities around 0.5, but instead my velocities in the section after my relaxation zones are closer to 0.1 (or lower) and then immediately behind the cylinder they jump up to the 0.3 range, before increasing again to around 0.5 in the outlet relaxation zone (see screenshot of clip). My waveProperties.input file looks like the following: Code:
seaLevel 0.00; // A list of the relaxation zones in the simulation. The parameters are given // in <name>Coeffs below. relaxationNames (inlet outlet); initializationName outlet; //pName p_rgh; inletCoeffs { waveType potentialCurrent; U ( 0.5 0 0 ); Tsoft 0; //waveType stokesFirst; // Regular waves //depth 25; // Water Depth //period 8; // Wave period //phi 0.00000; // Phase //direction (1.0 0.0 0.0); // Direction of incoming waves //height 1.5; // Wave height in meters relaxationZone { relaxationScheme Spatial; relaxationShape Rectangular; beachType Empty; relaxType INLET; startX (-160 -80 0.0); endX (-100 80 0.0); orientation (1.0 0.0 0.0); } }; outletCoeffs { waveType potentialCurrent; U (0 0 0); Tsoft 0; relaxationZone { relaxationScheme Spatial; relaxationShape Rectangular; beachType Empty; relaxType OUTLET; startX (180 -80 0.0); endX (240 80 0.0); orientation (1.0 0.0 0.0); } }; // ************************************************************************* // Thanks in advance everyone! |
|
August 17, 2016, 09:35 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
ArielJ
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi there,
I posted a question earlier about the very low velocities that I'm seeing but I've also noticed that the surface elevation does not maintain the input level. Has anyone had or solved an issue to do with a quickly dampening surface elevation? I have attached a snapshot of the surface elevation along the length of the tank. This is for a tank that is approximately 10*L long and each relaxation zone is approximately 1.5*L. *EDIT* - I just compared two simulations for a linear wave, one with both inlet and outlet relaxation zones and one with inlet only. The outlet relaxation zone is affecting the surface elevation far away from it... How can I fix this so it only damps out but doesn't affect it further up the domain?? QUESTION 2: I am trying to validate another simulation which uses a 25 m long wavelength in a domain that is only 8 metres long. How would I adjust the relaxation zones to keep the domain size the same? Is this possible? Last edited by arieljeds; August 23, 2016 at 09:32. Reason: added another example image, free surface elevation problems |
|
January 4, 2021, 20:57 |
|
#3 | |
New Member
Arun Kumar
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Dundee, Scotland
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 7 |
Quote:
Hello Ariel, I know that the post is quite old, but did you happen to find the reason behind this change in velocity? I am also trying to create an ONLY-Current scenario in my 2D wave tank. Like you, I am using potentialCurrent to generate a current (of 0.25 m/s) at the inlet. Please let me know if you have found a solution to this problem of reduced current velocity in the domain. Thanks, Arun. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unexpectedly high velocities - why??? | umop-3pisdn | STAR-CCM+ | 1 | July 11, 2018 04:55 |
Calculating vortex cores of relative velocities | Dorit | Tecplot | 1 | December 17, 2015 06:23 |
[OpenFOAM] converting velocities from cell centers to corner | torsy87 | ParaView | 1 | April 14, 2013 09:09 |
Derived velocities from loss coefficients ?? | jakjak | CFX | 1 | December 20, 2007 15:38 |
Tetrahedral Mesh At Lower Velocities | sam | FLUENT | 0 | June 1, 2005 01:36 |