CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Community Contributions

[waves2Foam] Numerical/Lab incident wave similarity

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   March 27, 2017, 13:26
Default Numerical/Lab incident wave similarity
  #1
New Member
 
Greg Nichols
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
grazarr is on a distinguished road
Dear all,
I'm trying to obtain numerical/lab data similarity of a solitary wave travelling down a waveflume acting on a rigid endplate.
Attached are my latest set of results with numerical data shown in black and existing lab data shown in red.

Lab wave parameters are:
Amplitude: 0.042m
Water depth: 0.2m

Numerical parameters (using waves2foam solitaryFirst waveType):
height: 0.072 (m)
depth: 0.4 (m)
direction: (0.5 0 0) (m/s)
x0: (0 0 0)

I am slightly concerned because in order to achieve the numerical results shown in the figure I had to increase the depth parameter to 0.4m; however my mesh is set to the depth of the lab flume (0.2m). How will the accuracy of my results be affected by this considering I will eventually be investigating the pressure distribution at the end plate?

There is also an input difference of 0.03m in amplitude between sets of data. Can anyone suggest to me why parameters I input into the program produce variations measured by the wave probes.

Also finally how would one suggest I adjust the numerical parameters to achieve more accurate incident solitary wave length.

Note:
-Wave probes are located at distances 3x, 8.5x and 18.5x water depth which correleate to 0.6m, 1.7m and 3.7m from the end plate respectively. (data from time=4.7 - t=8s represent wave reflections).
-OF v2.40

Kind regards
Greg Nichols

grazarr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 8, 2017, 10:43
Default
  #2
ngj
Senior Member
 
Niels Gjoel Jacobsen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 1,903
Rep Power: 37
ngj will become famous soon enoughngj will become famous soon enough
Hi Greg,

You should check for numerical diffusion and check that the implementation of the solitary wave is correct. It could also be that the first order solitary wave is not accurate enough, see earlier posts by other users.

Kind regards

Niels
__________________
Please note that I do not use the Friend-feature, so do not be offended, if I do not accept a request.
ngj is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFD in Naval Hydrodynamics, Off-Shore and Wave Modelling with OpenFOAM hjasak OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources 2 February 13, 2017 05:59
IHFOAM - Wave generation with moving boundaries Phicau OpenFOAM Verification & Validation 0 May 18, 2015 05:53
WAVE TANK star-ccm+ . wave height dampens. WHY? muhsin STAR-CCM+ 3 October 9, 2012 14:24
Scaling up a wave energy converter - free surface flow mark_l CFX 3 February 17, 2010 17:57
Incident wave angle ramTAMUg FLOW-3D 1 June 19, 2009 03:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44.