CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Community Contributions

[cfMesh] mesh improvements for 'face tets'

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 1, 2015, 14:15
Default mesh improvements for 'face tets'
  #1
Member
 
pici's Avatar
 
Pierluigi Cirrottola
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 52
Rep Power: 13
pici is on a distinguished road
Hi to everybody.
I'm using cfMesh to create meshes for complicated body.
It works well, but too much often I find 'face tet' errors; using simpleFoam or pimpleFoam it is only a warning (openFoam doesn't stop), but using Particle Tracking solver (e.g. DMPFoam or icoUncoupledKinematcParcelFoam) it becomes a blocking error.
Using "checkMesh -allGeometry" I should find 'face tet' errors: but cfMesh version and openFoam official version give different results: attached you will find two logfile that use the same mesh, generated by cfMesh.
They are really different, and it seams that cfMesh version is incomplete.
But the true question is: how can I improve the mesh quality in cfMesh, other then using improveMeshQuality tool? and how could I set its optional parameter?
Thank you a lot
Piero
Attached Files
File Type: txt chechM_cfMesf.txt (4.2 KB, 20 views)
File Type: txt checkMOF.txt (4.6 KB, 11 views)
pici is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 2, 2015, 05:31
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Franjo Juretic
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Velika Gorica, Croatia
Posts: 124
Rep Power: 17
franjo_j is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to franjo_j
Hi,

The installation of cfMesh is compiled with foam-extend-3.1, and the checkMesh uses standard mesh checks implemented in foam-extend-3.1. You are using OpenFOAM-2.4.0 for your simulation, and it has some additional checks implemented there.
To improve the quality inside cfMesh, you need to check whether the checks of your interest are already implemented there, and use them in the optimisation process. It is not available via some settings, you need to do some programming.

Regards,

Franjo
__________________
Principal Developer of cfMesh and CF-MESH+
www.cfmesh.com
Social media: LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram
franjo_j is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[snappyHexMesh] SHM problem : KVLCC2 with appendage mesh sc.park OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 March 13, 2016 14:28
[snappyHexMesh] SnappyHexMesh no layers and no decent mesh for complex geometry pizzaspinate OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 1 February 25, 2015 08:05
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 07:21
[Gmsh] 2D Mesh Generation Tutorial for GMSH aeroslacker OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 12 January 19, 2012 04:52
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 19:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:55.