CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Community Contributions

[flameletFoam] new flameletFoam for OpenFoam-2.3.0

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree12Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 14, 2015, 12:16
Default
  #21
Member
 
Hagen Müller
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 34
Rep Power: 15
Hagen is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uyan View Post
Hagen,

Here you have said the mixture fraction is calculated using a small amount of Argon added from the fuel inlet.

I just wanted to know if my understanding is correct.

Is it added as a tracer element so within the counter-flow flame thickness instead of calculating mixture fraction explicitly by Bilger's formulation, Yar/Yar_fuel is used as the mixture fraction ?
Dear Uyan,

that's correct, Yar/Yar_fuel is used. The code is in line 585 of Cantera-CounterflowFlame/src/flamelet.cpp.

Best wishes, Hagen
Hagen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 14, 2015, 16:12
Default Mixture fraction definition
  #22
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 12
Uyan is on a distinguished road
Thank you Hagen and Wenxu,

So user must always specify a very small amount of Argon at the Fuel inlet right?

But, flamelet script seems to work without initial solution with no Argon.How can that happen?

In the paper suggested by Wenxu, by Prof Pitsch and Prof Peters discuss about a third method for mixture fraction which is different from more popular two feed system and Bilger's formula. They define mixture fraction conserved scalar transport equation. [Eqn 13]

That method is quite similar to Argon transport equation, so I guess that is the theory behind using Argon ?
Uyan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2017, 10:59
Default
  #23
New Member
 
Faezeh
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 14
faeze.d is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by babakflame View Post
Dear Likun

My suggestion is first check the LES properties file in O.F. 2.3.o to see whether other inputs are needed in your LES properties file or not (for smagorinsky model).

nest step, might be check the code for adding headers that might be needed.

Best,
Bobi
Hi Bobi
i am using flameletfoam to simulate a DLR-A flame. as you may know it's a free flame and i have some troules with boundary conditions. the B.Cs are:
Uinlet : fixedValue
Uoutlet: inletoutlet
Uoutside: pressureinletoutletvelocity

T is calculated for all boundaries
P is totalpressure at the outside and outlet and zerogradient at the inlet bounderies.

but there is reflections in the outside boundaries. do you have any suggestion?
thank you
faeze.d is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 18, 2017, 14:23
Default
  #24
Senior Member
 
Bobby
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 454
Rep Power: 15
babakflame is on a distinguished road
Hey Faeze

I am not working on combustion any more. However, for hinting you I should say:

The reflections from outside boundary might happen more frequently in future when you want to simulate swirl flames

Let me know are you using LES or RAS , give me a little perspective of your grid as well.

I will put a general post so as to be useful for everybody and avoid multiple questions
babakflame is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2017, 10:33
Default Boundary conditions
  #25
New Member
 
LE Van Minh
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Poitiers, France
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0
conga8893 is on a distinguished road
Hi everyone,

First, Hagen, I have to thank you very much for developing the new useful solver that help me a lot and this thread also is very interesting.

Now, I'm confused some places in the Z boundary conditions of the case flame Sandia D in tutorial. In fact, the boundary condition of Z for patch PILOT is 0.271. How can you calculate this value? and can you explain it mathematically?
PILOT
{
type fixedValue;
value uniform 0.271;
}

Have a good day,
Minh
conga8893 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 10, 2017, 03:05
Default
  #26
Member
 
Mukesh Adlak
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 10
Adlak is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Likun View Post
Hi Howard,

I fully agree with what Hagen said. Flamelet model by concept is for modeling of non-premixed combustion. For premixed combustion you need progress variable as the independent variable instead of mixture fraction as in flamelet model. However, for partially-premixed flame you still need mixture fraction. I think the best way for you is to modify this code, add progress variable. This should not be too difficult if you understand the structure of flameletFoam. I have already implemented FGM model based on the flameletFoam, and it is working fine. After adding progress variable, you need generate a lookup table using progress variable (and mixture fraction) as independent variable. This can be done by Cantera, FlameMaster or CHEM1D. I am using CHEM1D flame Eindhoven university.

Good Luck!

Best,
Likun


Hi Likun,

I want to generate flamelets for h2-air non-premixed combustion. Can u help me how to do that using chem1d.

Thanks
Adlak is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Multiple Floating Objects with 6DoF in OF 2.3.0 tyoung OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 23 June 11, 2024 01:13
[OpenFOAM.org] Problem in installing OpenFOAM 2.3.0 !!! omid20110 OpenFOAM Installation 6 August 1, 2016 11:20
Difference in the results between OF 2.3.0 and OF 2.4.0 simpleFoam Olgierd OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 27, 2015 11:23
Liquid Evaporation Model Error in OF 2.3.0 brbbhatti OpenFOAM 11 June 16, 2014 09:40
Installing Mixing_plane in either OpenFOAM 2.3.0 or 1.6-ext Jiricbeng OpenFOAM Installation 7 May 18, 2014 15:46


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:19.