|
[Sponsors] |
Should initialized DD fields be different for different materials? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 25, 2022, 04:48 |
Should initialized DD fields be different for different materials?
|
#1 |
Member
Ashish Magar
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi..
I am doing a solids contact simulation using impactBar as a template. When I am using same material for the complete geometry, I can see the areaContact field is increasing as expected. However when I am assigning materials to cellZones, the areaContact field remains zero. For both the trials I used the same mesh where there is a contact. The assigned cellzones had density lower that the initial trial of same material throughout. I had initialized with DD, DD_0, DD_0_0, DD_0_0_0, and the similar D fields same as impactBar tutorial. But only when I am using a homogenous material the contact is solved. So should I be assigning different DD values for different materials? I understand DD is just V * delT, but I only faced this issue when the material assign are different. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Postprocess: sampleDict works but creates no output folder | shock77 | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 14 | November 15, 2021 09:27 |
Adding material to CFX material library | marlon | CFX | 2 | October 16, 2016 10:33 |
a reconstructPar issue | immortality | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 8 | June 16, 2013 12:25 |
an odd(at least for me!) reconstructPar error on a field | immortality | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | June 3, 2013 23:36 |
Installing OpenFOAM 1.6-ext on Ubuntu 11.10 | immortality | OpenFOAM Installation | 17 | May 6, 2013 18:43 |