CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > OpenFOAM > OpenFOAM Community Contributions > OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction

[solids4Foam] Set up deformation problem. Why Snappy builds a 2D Mesh?

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 6, 2021, 23:08
Default Set up deformation problem. Why Snappy builds a 2D Mesh?
  #1
Member
 
Francisco T
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 64
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 15
frantov is on a distinguished road
Hi Foamers


Im working on a problem using solids4foam but I cant get it to work.


One set of surfaces have a 'negative' pressure and another set of surfaces undergoes deformation. The rest of the domain is fixed.

What are the ideal settings for this case?

So far, I have tried a few different ones but, interestingly the set of surfaces undergoing deformation "does not deform at all".


The image attached is from:

solidProperties:
solidModel unsLinearGeometry;

mechanicalProperties:linearElastic;

The mesh was done using snappyHexMesh using 8 stls.

I have also tried

nonLinearGeometryUpdatedLagrangian;

nonLinearGeometryTotalLagrangianTotalDisplacement; ;


In all these models, the surface that has to be deformed in theory, does not deform at all.

I set up this case in Ansys and I got the deformation I was expecting, therefore Im cleary missing something in the OF setup.


Any help is appreciated, and thanks for the development of these amazing libraries!
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg WhatsApp Image 2021-09-07 at 11.49.43.jpeg (89.3 KB, 14 views)

Last edited by frantov; September 7, 2021 at 00:47. Reason: spelling
frantov is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2021, 23:23
Default
  #2
Member
 
Francisco T
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 64
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 15
frantov is on a distinguished road
Im thinking the problem is the mesh. checkMesh tells me it is a 2D mesh!. Im trying to fix that issue now, anyone has experienced something similar?



$ checkMesh


Checking geometry...
This is a 2-D mesh
Overall domain bounding box (-0.000326 -0.000451 -1e-06) (0.000326 0.000451 0.000451)
Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) directions (1 1 0)
Mesh (non-empty) directions (1 1 0)
Mesh (non-empty, non-wedge) dimensions 2
All edges aligned with or perpendicular to non-empty directions.
Boundary openness (-1.93205e-16 -1.63864e-16 -4.70151e-16) Threshold = 1e-06 OK.
Max cell openness = 2.02888e-16 OK.
Max aspect ratio = 1.99558 OK.
Minumum face area = 1.8419e-10. Maximum face area = 1.47026e-09. Face area magnitudes OK.
Min volume = 4.15348e-15. Max volume = 3.32279e-14. Total volume = 2.25227e-10. Cell volumes OK.
Mesh non-orthogonality Max: 39.3783 average: 5.31682 Threshold = 70
Non-orthogonality check OK.
Face pyramids OK.
Max skewness = 0.657972 OK.

Mesh OK.
frantov is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2021, 00:44
Default
  #3
Member
 
Francisco T
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 64
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 15
frantov is on a distinguished road
Hi All



I was able to solve my problem. The issue was a silly error in blockMesh.

The boundary section was commented out. Hence the background mesh for snappy was ambiguous.



It actually helped me to document what was wrong, so I'll leave the post here.
Attached Images
File Type: png fig1.png (38.8 KB, 6 views)
frantov is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
deformation, solids4foam


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Divergence detected in AMG solver. VOF. Mr.Mister Fluent Multiphase 4 September 25, 2023 08:10
Fail to converge when solving with a fabricated solution zizhou FLUENT 0 March 22, 2021 07:33
static vs. total pressure auf dem feld FLUENT 17 February 26, 2016 14:04
sonicFoam - pressure driven pipe: flow continuity violation and waveTransmissive BC Endel OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 September 11, 2014 17:29
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet chong chee nan FLUENT 0 December 29, 2001 06:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:19.