|
[Sponsors] |
[solids4Foam] newMovingWallVelocity boundary cindition in in FSI simulation |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 26, 2020, 10:26 |
newMovingWallVelocity boundary condition in in FSI simulation
|
#1 |
New Member
peyman havaej
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 16
Rep Power: 10 |
Dear Foamers
As far as I know, the newMovingWallVelocity boundary condition has been developed in the solids4foam toolkit. I began to simulate a simple test case for the fluid region by solids4foam; therefore I set the physics to the fluid. I considered different test cases to examine the effect of using the newMovingWallVelocity boundary condition. I found that when the newMovingWallVelocity was used for a stationary wall, some minor differences (fluctuations) in velocity were observed in the comparison of using noSlip or fixedValue boundary condition. It should be noted that these minor differences have significant effects on other variables and the fluid solution. To sum up, fixedValue or noSlip boundary conditions resulted in more logical and accurate numerical simulations. I am aware that this boundary condition is essential for FSI simulation, however, I am eager to know that can the newMovingWallVelocity only be used in the FSI interface? Or can it also be employed in a single region (fluid) simulation? Best Regards, Peyman Last edited by peyman.havaej; February 28, 2020 at 05:41. |
|
Tags |
boundary condition, fsi, newmovingwallvelocity, solids4foam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can I achieve better convergence? | sheaker | CFX | 12 | September 19, 2019 16:36 |
Difficulty In Setting Boundary Conditions | Moinul Haque | CFX | 4 | November 25, 2014 18:30 |
An error has occurred in cfx5solve: | volo87 | CFX | 5 | June 14, 2013 18:44 |
Low Mixing time Problem | Mavier | CFX | 5 | April 29, 2013 01:00 |
domain imbalance for enrgy equation | happy | CFX | 14 | September 6, 2012 02:54 |